Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2025 (2) TMI 919

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 1961 [hereinafter referred to as "the Act"], for the Assessment Year 2018-19. 2. The Assessee has taken the following grounds of appeal:- "1. In law and in the facts and circumstances of the Appellant's case, impugned order u/s. 263 of the Act passed by PCIT-1, Ahmedabad is bad in law and deserves to be quashed. 2. In law and in the facts and circumstances of the Appellant's case, the PCIT-1, Ahmedabad has erred in setting aside the assessment order dated 16.04.2021 passed by the Assessing Officer without considering the fact that the Assessing officer during the course of Assessment proceedings has already gone through issue regarding disallowance u/s 14A of the Act and after satisfying himself with respect to the details subm .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... essment Centre, Delhi u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 143(3A) & 143(3B) of the Act on 16.04.2021 determining the total loss of Rs. 35,36,60,186/- against the returned income of Rs. (-) 35,46,83,225/-. Subsequently, the Ld. PCIT had assumed revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263 of the Act, based on following issues which were allegedly not verified by the Assessing Officer during the course of assessment proceedings: (i) Disallowance u/s 14A of the Act read with Rule 8D to tune of Rs. 27,05,510/-, and (ii) Payment of compensation of Rs. 60,00,000/- being allegedly not allowable as deduction u/s 28 to 44DA of the Act. 4. Aggrieved by the order of the Ld. PCIT, the assessee is now in appeal before the Tribunal. 5. Before us, Ld. AR submitted that assessmen .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... balance of the value of investment. * The interest-bearing fund has been specifically utilized for the purpose of investing in trade & business assets. * Disallowance u/s 14A cannot be made for investment made in Partnership Firm. * The administrative expenses incurred during the current year is purely for the purpose of main business and hence no disallowance of any administrative expense should be made only on presumption of incurrence thereof for the purpose of earning tax free income. 6. The Ld. DR, on the other hand, supported the order of the Ld. PCIT and contended that the Assessing Officer had not considered Rule 8D(2)(iii) and had overruled the Board's Circular No. 05/2014 dated 11.02.2014 therefore, the expenses which a .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer was neither erroneous nor prejudicial to the interest of the revenue. In conclusion, Ld. PCIT and held as under: (ii) On the issue of compensation of Rs. 60,00,000/-, the Assessing Officer is directed to call for all the details of expenses and verify its allowability considering the provisions of section 28 to 44DA and also in view of provisions of section 37(1) of the Act. The Assessing Officer may allow such expenditure if it is found to be incurred for the purpose of business. 10. After hearing the arguments of both the sides, we find that, in the year under consideration, the assessee has debited Rs. 60,00,000/- as compensation expenses in Profit and Loss Account separately in Annexu .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... tion 37 of the Act does not get attracted at all in the instant case. 11. In view of above facts, it is clear that the compensation expenses of Rs. 60 lakhs paid in year under consideration is on account of contractual payment and not on account of any violation of any law and hence, no disallowance in this regard is warranted under the provisions of the Act. Since no disallowance is warranted as enumerated above, the assessment order passed u/s 143(3) of the Act by Assessing Officer can neither be held as 'erroneous' nor 'prejudicial or fatal to the interest of revenue'. We find that the Assessing Officer has also examined the issue during the assessment proceedings as found in the notice issued u/s 142(1) of the Act. Ther .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates