9911796707
TMI Blog2025 (4) TMI 723X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e : Smt. Mamta Singh, Sr.DR ORDER PER MAKARAND V. MAHADEOKAR, AM: This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [hereinafter referred to as "CIT(A)"] under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [hereinafter referred to as "the Act"], dated 14.11.2024 for the Assessment Year 2019-20, confi ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... /-, resulting in a demand of Rs. 1,88,580/-. Aggrieved by the said rectification order, the assessee preferred an appeal before the CIT(A). The learned CIT(A), vide order dated 14.11.2024, upheld the disallowance, holding that the assessee, being a retired employee of a public sector undertaking (SBI), could not be treated as a government employee for the purpose of claiming full exemption u/s 10( ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... s nullified and a refund of Rs. 1,010/- was determined. It was further submitted that while processing the refund, the earlier payment of Rs. 1,88,580/- made by the assessee on 18.11.2021 was not taken into account and a letter has already been submitted to the Assessing Officer seeking issuance of the due refund. 6. Considering the subsequent development and submissions made by the learned AR, t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
