2025 (4) TMI 809

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ndent Nos. 1 to 4: Adv. Subir Kumar with Adv. Niyanta Trivedi,. For the Respondent Nos. 5- State: Ms. Jyoti Chavan, Addl.G. P. with Adv. Manish Upadhye, AGP,. P. C. 1. The above Writ Petition is filed seeking a declaration that the development rights under a revenue sharing arrangement are not a "supply" of services, leivable to GST under Section 7 read with Section 9 of the CGST Act and the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ng on behalf of Respondent Nos. 1 to 4, we find that the arguable questions are raised in the above Writ Petition. Hence, we issue RULE. 4. As far as interim reliefs are concerned, we find that the issue in the present case is similar, though not identical, to the issue that was raised before the Gujarat High Court wherein the Gujarat High Court considered whether an assignment of a lease would f .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... hearing and final disposal of this petition, this Hon'ble Court be pleased to direct the Respondents by themselves, their officers, subordinates, servants and agents by an interim order and injunction from acting upon or taking any further steps or proceedings in pursuance of and/or in furtherance Order-in-Original No. 35/GST/ CGST-NM/ADC/AKS/2024-25 dated 02.01.2025 issued in Form DRC-07 (Ref. N .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X