9911796707
TMI Blog2025 (5) TMI 1510X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... December, 2023 issued for the year 2018-19 and impugned order dated 10th March, 2024 issued by the Respondent No. 4-Sales Tax Officer, Class II/AVATO, ward 77, Zone 7, Delhi under section 73 of the Delhi Goods & Service Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter 'the DGST Act'). 3. The petition also challenges the vires of Notification No. 09/2023-State Tax dated 22nd June, 2023 (hereinafter 'impugned notification'). 4. The impugned notification was under consideration before this Court in a batch of matters with the lead matter being W.P.(C) 16499/2023 titled 'DJST Traders Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India and Ors.'. In the said batch of petitions, on 22nd April, 2025, the parties were heard at length qua the validity of the impugned notification and accordi ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... validity of Notification No. 56 of 2023 (Central Tax). This judgment of the Telangana High Court is now presently under consideration by the Supreme Court in S.L.P No 4240/2025 titled M/s HCC-SEW-MEIL-AAG JV v. Assistant Commissioner of State Tax & Ors. The Supreme Court vide order dated 21st February, 2025, passed the following order in the said case: "1. The subject matter of challenge before the High Court was to the legality, validity and propriety of the Notification No. 13/2022 dated 5-7-2022 & Notification Nos. 9 and 56 of 2023 dated 31-3-2023 & 8-12-2023 respectively. 2. However, in the present petition, we are concerned with Notification Nos. 9 & 56/2023 dated 31-3-2023 respectively. 3. These Notifications have been issued in ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... pect to the vires of Section 168-A of the Act as well as the notifications issued in purported exercise of power under Section 168-A of the Act which have been challenged, and we direct that all these present connected cases shall be governed by the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court and the decision thereto shall be binding on these cases too. 67. Since the matter is pending before the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the interim order passed in the present cases, would continue to operate and would be governed by the final adjudication by the Supreme Court on the issues in the aforesaid SLP-4240-2025. 68. In view of the aforesaid, all these connected cases are disposed of accordingly along with pending applications, if any." ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... noted that the validity of the central notifications-Notification Nos. 56/2023-CT and 09/2023-CT-is presently under consideration before the Hon'ble Supreme Court in S.L.P. No. 4240/2025 titled M/s HCC-SEW-MEIL-AAG JV v. Assistant Commissioner of State Tax & Ors., had disposed of matters wherein challenge was limited to the central notifications, after addressing other factual issues raised in the respective petitions, with a direction that such matters would remain subject to the outcome of the proceedings before the Supreme Court. However, in cases where the challenge is to the parallel State Notifications, the same have been retained for consideration by this Court. The lead matter in the said batch is W.P.(C) 9214/2024 titled Engineers ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
