TMI Blog1996 (5) TMI 95X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... s petition is directed against the impugned orders dated 22-8-1984, 28-9-1979 and 28-6-1979 contained in annexures 11, 8 and 7 to the petition passed by the Respondents No. 1, 2 and 3 respectively. 3.The short facts leading to the petition are as under :- The petitioner M/s. Charan Metal Corporation is carrying on business of manufacturing steel furniture since 1965 with the aid of power and ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... and also imposed a penalty Rs. 50,000/- and demanded duty on the manufacture of steel furniture valued at Rs. 7,56,987.62 cleared during the period from 1-4-1973 to 10-9-1975. On an appeal by the appellants to the Central Board of Excise and Customs, the Board passed an order dated 28-9-1979 upholding the orders passed by the Respondent No. 1 the Collector, Central Excise, Kanpur. Against this ord ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ve not made statement on oath before this Court. What was the sufficient cause which prevented petitioners to appear before the authority concerned when the statements of above referred witnesses were recorded. 6.No doubt without giving notice to the parties if the statements are used and order is passed the same vitiates the proceedings as same cannot be used against the persons concerned. How ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
