Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2002 (9) TMI 200

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e to the consumer, shall amount to "manufacture"." 2. In the order impugned in this appeal, the Commissioner has held that by application of these notes, the activities undertaken by the appellant before us, must be deemed to be manufacture, and demanded duty and imposed penalty on the appellant. 3. The appellant is a trader in textile chemicals. Paragraphs 2 and 3 of the Commissioner's order narrate the activities of the appellant, which are under consideration before us, as follows : "2. M/s. TC procures the orders from the customers through their marketing staff specifying the quantity, product and also the mode of packing. The prices are fixed by negotiation and the orders are received either verbally or in writing. Subsequently, .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... on, the name of the consignor (the appellant) and of the consignee constitutes any of the activities specified in the notes. 5. Among the various arguments that the counsel for the appellant raises, we will consider two. These are that merely printing on the drums the name and address of the consignor (appellant) and the consignee does not itself amount to labelling imparting information as to the nature of the product, its technical or other characteristics and none of these has been done. The second contention is that the activity in order to attract the note must be one which renders the product marketable. The marketability of the product was not in question before the appellant put the names of the buyer and seller on its container. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ned in the bottle, package, or box to which it is affixed, and not to distinguish it from articles of the same general nature manufactured or sold by others, thus securing to the producer the benefits of any increased sale by reason of any peculiar excellence he may have given to it, as a trademark does." 8. Mere putting of the name and address on the container of the goods of the consignee and consignor does not, in our opinion, amount to labelling as it is generally understood and therefore as to be denoted by the notes in question. If putting names and addresses on packages amounts to labelling, every person who writes a letter and puts upon the letter indicated the recipient of his own name and address has to be considered to have lab .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... an attractive jar meant for retail use and placing on it a label containing a brand name enhanced the value of the cosmetics in measurement. In fact in many of these products, it is the container or label worth more than the cost of the contents. The position is however different in the case of the products falling in the chapter that we are not concerned with. In the vast majority of these products, the question of packing, labelling, repacking or relabelling or otherwise dealing with the products so as to render it marketable to "consumer" i.e. a person who buys it other than wholesale purchaser, would not generally arise with occasional exception such as boric acid. These goods are largely used by a factory or other such industry and the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Association v. CCE - 1990 (49) E.L.T. 58 has held that stencilling on the components manufactured by the members of the Association of parts such as quantity, volume, ancillary etc. given by BHEL to whom the goods were supplied, amounted to taxing the brand name. This decision therefore affords some support in the departmental representative's contention that putting the name of the buyer may amount to labelling. After all it cannot be denied that putting a brand name on product is a labelling. However, the judgment of the single judge has been reversed on appeal by the Division Bench as reported in 1990 (49) E.L.T. 33. The ratio of the judgment in S.N. Mohideen v. UOI 1989 (39) E.L.T. 376 is that affixing the labels on the wrappers of bir .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates