Initiation of penalty proceedings - CIT u/s 263 ordered non ...

CIT's Section 263 Order Doesn't Prevent AO from Initiating Penalty Proceedings Based on Case Facts.

July 6, 2013

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Initiation of penalty proceedings - CIT u/s 263 ordered non initiation of penalty proceedings - it does not mean that the hands of the AO is tied on invoking the provisions under the Act, which, otherwise, would be applicable to the facts of the case - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Initiation of penalty proceedings - CIT u/s 263 ordered non ...

CIT's Section 263 Order Doesn't Prevent AO from Initiating Penalty Proceedings Based on Case Facts.

July 6, 2013

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

Proceedings initiated u/s 144C - legality of the order by framing the so-called draft assessment order - while framing the said draft assessment order, the AO not only...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Validity of notice - It is a well settled proposition of law that penalty cannot be initiated for the limb, which is different from the limb for...

Initiation of penalty proceedings u/s 271C and the limitation period for levying such penalty. The key points are: The penalty proceedings were initiated on the date of...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Defective notice u/s 274 - in the assessment order, AO has made it clear that penalty proceedings are initiated separately for furnishing...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) - AO has not applied his mind before initiating the penalty proceedings rather borrowed his satisfaction from the “tax...

Revision u/s 263 - penalty proceedings u/s 271AAB(1A) - The mandate under section 263 of the Act do not give any power to CIT to impose his satisfaction over the...

Penalty proceedings under CGST Act cannot be initiated after State GST Authorities have initiated proceedings on the same subject matter. Once proceedings are initiated...

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) for under reporting income - defective notice - The Tribunal agrees with the appellant's argument, emphasizing that the AO did not apply his mind...

The Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) considered the validity of proceedings u/s 153C, focusing on whether the satisfaction note recorded by the AO of the searched person was...

Penalty u/s 271D or 271E - Penalty u/s.271D or 271E of the Act is concerned, those are independent proceedings and having nothing to do with assessment proceedings or...

Levy of Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) in case of voluntary surrender of income - disallowance of claim of loss - Assessee offered the loss voluntarily to avoid litigation and...

Once proceedings of penalty us 273(2)(a) or sec.273(2)(aa) have not been initiated in the regular assessment by AO, then penalty proceedings cannot be initiated in the...

The court held that Section 6(2)(b) of the Act treats the empowered officers under the SGST/UGST Act at the central level to be at par and does not prescribe for...

The Appellate Tribunal examined the validity of penalty proceedings u/s 270A due to the failure to specify relevant clauses. It was held that the penalty proceedings...

The Assessing Officer (AO) consciously deleted irrelevant portions from the show cause notice, mentioning only the charge of furnishing inaccurate particulars of income....

Quick Updates: