Adjournment of case - there is no valid reason for the ...

Judicial Member's Recusal Unwarranted for Case Adjournment; Affects 25% of Bench Appeals with Specific Advocate Involvement.

September 6, 2013

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Adjournment of case - there is no valid reason for the adjournment on the ground that the Judicial Member has recused himself from hearing the cases of Shri S. K. Garg, Advocate and more so in the light of the facts that about 25% of the appeals pending before the Bench are being represented by Shri S. K. Garg, Advocate or Shri Pradeep Kumar Kapoor, C. A. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Adjournment of case - there is no valid reason for the ...

Judicial Member's Recusal Unwarranted for Case Adjournment; Affects 25% of Bench Appeals with Specific Advocate Involvement.

September 6, 2013

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Reference the matter to the larger bench of 3 members by the Single Member Bench - Even if the learned Member hearing this appeal found it difficult to accept the view...

Jurisdiction of NCLT - Constitution of its Benches - Competency of Member of the Tribunal to function as a Bench - The Court interprets Section 419(3) of the Companies...

Referring matter to larger bench - It is not open to the Referral Bench to appreciate the judgment rendered by the earlier Bench as if sitting in appeal to hold that the...

Pursuant to sections 109(1), (3) and (4) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, the Ministry of Finance constituted the Goods and Services Tax Appellate...

The CESTAT dismissed an appeal for non-prosecution under Rule 20 of CESTAT Procedure Rules, 1982, after multiple adjournments exceeded the statutory maximum of three....

Maintainability of appeal - non-prosecution of the case - Request for adjournment, which cannot be accepted in virtual hearing - The case involved repeated requests for...

Judicial discipline - Where facts and law in a subsequent assessment year are the same, no authority whether quasi judicial or judicial can generally be permitted to...

Maintainability of appeal before tribunal - Seizure of goods - Section 110(A) - Two member bench disagrees with the decision of larger bench - matter referred to the...

Rectification u/s 254 - violation of the provisions of section 255(3) - appeal heard by a Single Member Bench instead of Division Bench - since the income assessed in...

CESTAT dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution pursuant to Rule 20 of CESTAT Procedure Rules, 1982. The appellant had sought adjournments beyond the statutory maximum...

Constitution of the GST Appellate Tribunal - Section 110(1)(b)(iii) of the CGST Act which states that a Member of the Indian Legal Services, who has held a post not less...

Bench Reconstitution and Order Pronouncement - Whether an order reserved by a bench could be pronounced by a reconstituted bench without considering a subsequent...

The coordinate benches of the Tribunal have consistently decided the issue of availment of CENVAT credit by insurance companies on invoices issued by dealers or...

Applicability of Section 129(6) of the Customs Act on a person appointed as member(judicial) of CESTAT – a person offered appointment as Judicial (Member) not be...

The CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, dismissed an appeal due to abatement caused by non-prosecution of the case. The Tribunal held that adjourning a matter beyond three...

Quick Updates: