Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights January 2014 Year 2014 This

Power of CIT u/s 264 - Revision in favor of assessee - Power ...

Income Tax

January 11, 2014

Power of CIT u/s 264 - Revision in favor of assessee - Power under Section 264 of the Act, is wide enough, to include rectification of a “bonafide” error committed by an assessee, while claiming exemptions, under the Act - HC

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Condonation of delay filling Revision u/s 264 - refund of the FBT return - Powers conferred under Section 264 of the Act are very wide. Commissioner is bound to apply...

  2. Revision u/s 264 in favor of assessee - petitioner has not waived his appellate right - delay of 2 years, 10 months and 8 days can not be condoned - HC

  3. Revision u/s 264 in favor of assessee - It is manifest that only suo-motu power of the Commissioner under Section 264 of the IT Act, is restricted against an order...

  4. Revision power u/s 264 - CIT committed a manifest error in exercising revisional power when petitioner's appeal was pending before CIT (Appeals) - HC

  5. Period of limitations u/s 153 - To include order of PCCIT/ CCIT u/s 263 or 264 for revision order which were not available earlier.

  6. Revision u/s 264 in favor of assessee - the appeal of the Assessee has not been disposed on merits. In view of this, there was no bar to the CIT in exercising...

  7. Applications u/s 264 for revision in favor of assessee - Condonation of delay - Proviso to Sub-Section (3) of Section 264 confers a statutory power on the Commissioner...

  8. Revision u/s 264 - Petitioners after dismissal of the earlier petition by this Court against the same assessment order without filing any statutory Appeal before the CIT...

  9. Revision u/s 264 in favor of assessee - Commissioner has rejected the revision petition u/s 264 on the ground of that the Petitioner did not comply with the mandatory...

  10. Denial of CENVAT Credit - Capital goods - The intent is wide enough to accept MS Tank as capital goods. - HC

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates