Penalty under s. 20(l) RTI Act - delayed reply - Commission to ...

Penalty of Rs. 250/Day Imposed for Delayed RTI Responses u/s 20(1) to Ensure Timely Compliance.

June 4, 2014

Case Laws Indian Laws HC

Penalty under s. 20(l) RTI Act - delayed reply - Commission to impose a Rs. 250 daily penalty till the application for information is received or the information is given. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty under s. 20(l) RTI Act - delayed reply - Commission to ...

Penalty of Rs. 250/Day Imposed for Delayed RTI Responses u/s 20(1) to Ensure Timely Compliance.

June 4, 2014

Case Laws Indian Laws HC

You may also like:

Section 12(1)(b) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 requires reporting entities to furnish information about transactions referred to in Section 12(1)(a) to...

Contravention of Sections 8(1) and 9(1)(f)(i) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - receiving foreign exchange payments in 1996-97 through fake export documents...

Levy of penalties u/ss 122 and 129 of CGST/SGST Acts - expiry of e-way bill - mens rea in penalty imposition. Technically, violation of law by petitioner in transporting...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that every non-compliance with a notice u/s 142(1) gives a separate cause of action for levying penalty u/s 271(1)(b)....

Penalty imposed under FEMA for non-compliance with Paragraph 9(1)(B) of Schedule 1 to FEMA Regulations, 2000. Section 13 FEMA does not require intention for penalizing...

Penalty u/s 271FA - non-compliance with the provisions of Section 285BA(1)(b) - non filing of a return in time - The respondents had specifically considered the...

Penalty u/s 271B - no tax audit conducted u/s 44AB - bonafide belief - When Gross profit is more than Rs.4 crores, it means the Gross Receipts were definitely more than...

The Appellate Tribunal considered a case involving the levy of penalty u/s 272A(1)(d) for non-compliance with a notice u/s 142(1) due to the Accountant's Covid-19...

Penalty u/s 272A(1)(d) - non compliance to notices u/s 142(1) - The provisions of Section 272A(1)(d) is of deterrent in nature and not for earning revenue. The remedy...

Penalty proceedings u/s. 271(1)(b) - non-compliance with the 3 notices u/s. 142(1) - Delay in late response as per date mentioned in notice - The Tribunal found merit in...

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee company failed to provide bonafide explanation for inflated expenses claimed in revised return, contrary to audited...

The case involves penalty imposition u/s 272A(1)(d) for non-compliance with statutory notices issued u/ss 143(2) and 142(1). Assessee explained non-compliance due to a...

Rejection of declared transaction value under Valuation Rule 12, re-determination of value under Valuation Rules 4-9. Commissioner followed Rule 9, adopted actual values...

The HC held that it lacks power to condone delay in filing appeals beyond 120 days stipulated u/s 74(1) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land...

The key points are regarding the penalty imposed u/s 271D read with Section 269SS, and the issue of whether the penalty orders were time-barred. The Assessing Officer...

Quick Updates: