Invocation of section 145(3) - existence of infirmities and ...

Income Tax

July 5, 2014

Invocation of section 145(3) - existence of infirmities and discrepancies in the accounts maintained by the assessee was a pre-requisite for invoking the provisions of Section 145 - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Invocation of section 145(3) - existence of infirmities and ...

Income Tax

July 5, 2014

You may also like:

Penalty u/s. 271A - confusion between the ‘books of account’ as per section 44AA and the ‘accounts’ as per section 145(3) - no finding either by the AO or by the CIT(A)...

Rejection of books of accounts - rejection of books of account by invoking the provisions of section 145(3) - the AO has categorically noted in the assessment order...

Once the book results are rejected by invoking provisions of section 145(3) of the Act, no separate additions could be made under section 68 - AT

Disallowance of total contract expenses - required details of contract expense were not submitted before the AO - Therefore, we confirm the order of rejection U/s 145(3) - AT

Rejection of Book u/s 145(3) - cash sale of silver - It was obligatory on the Assessees to satisfactorily account for the creditworthiness, identity and genuineness of...

Addition being 10% of all the Direct & Indirect expenditure - AO has not pointed out any mistake in any of the bills/vouchers. Since, the accounts of the assessee are...

Rejection of books of accounts - the assessee is not maintaining the proper books of account with regard to stock - to plug the leakage of revenue, certain disallowance...

Extended period of limitation - Contract for outdoor catering services - The invocation of extended period is unsustainable as the non-registration and non-payment of...

Rejection of books of accounts u/s 145(3) - assesee was dealing in gems and jewellery - It is difficult to maintain the stock register in this line of business of the...

Refund claim - Since registration of premises is not a pre-requisite condition for claiming input tax credit, denial of the refund benefit on such ground is not legally...

Quick Updates: