Merely because erstwhile owner though it had ceased to carry on ...

Central Excise

November 23, 2014

Merely because erstwhile owner though it had ceased to carry on business on the premises in question, had failed to apply for de-registration and/or cancellation of the Registration Certificate and/or the department has not de-registered and/or cancelled the Registration Certificate issued in favour of the erstwhile owner, the same is no ground to deny Central Excise Registration to the subsequent purchaser-lessees - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Merely because erstwhile owner though it had ceased to carry on ...

Central Excise

November 23, 2014

You may also like:

Central excise registration cancelled - Purchaser of land - Merely because the defaulter unit, though it had ceased to carry on business on the premises in question, had...

Outdoor catering Service - the appellant does not cease to be an ‘outdoor caterer', merely because the service has been provided at the premises provided by the service...

Jurisdiction - power of respondent to seal the business premises - proper authorization - access to the business premises was not denied by the petitioner - Revenue...

Classification of goods - Borotik Boards out of rubber wood - the 'Borotik Boards' in question will only merit classification in erstwhile CETA Heading 4403.00...

Recovery of excise dues payable by the erstwhile owner of the land and property - Dues of central excise became payable on the manufacturing of excisable items by the...

Income from house property - Vacancy allowance - Tenant stopped payment rent and stopped using the premises but did not handover the possession back to assessee owner - AT

LTCG - Receipt of additional amount towards TDR - treatment to receipt of consideration the appellant ceased to be the owner of the property - compensation received for...

Capital gain - real owner of property - Addition in the hands of AOP or members of AOP - once the share of the respective member is allotted by the AOP then the AOP...

The mere fact that the respondent did not earn any income on its investment made, the interest expenditure would not cease to be an expenditure incurred for business.

Business premises let out - Whether assessable as assets under section 2(ea) of Wealth tax or not - premises were not covered by exclusions provided under section 2(ea)(i) - AT

Quick Updates: