Commissioner has observed that penalty under Rule 13(1) can be ...

Central Excise

March 13, 2015

Commissioner has observed that penalty under Rule 13(1) can be imposed on the appellant but he further observed that the appellant has not been able to make out a case for reduction of penalty. But he failed to discuss why the appellant has not made out a case for reduction of penalty. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Commissioner has observed that penalty under Rule 13(1) can be ...

Central Excise

March 13, 2015

You may also like:

Levy of penalty u/s 112 (a) of the Customs Act 1962 - Customs House Agent (CHA) - violation of Regulation 13 of CHALR 2004 - It is alleged that the appellant did not...

Levy of penalty u/s 272A(1)(d) - The bonafide or other wise malafide of non compliance is also required to be kept in mind. The tax and interest are statutory levies,...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - when the Assessing Officer is not able to prove that the assessee was guilty of fraud or gross or willful negligence, penalty cannot be sustained - AT

Reduction in quantum of penalty imposed under Rule 26(2) (i) & (ii) - the Tribunal would say that there is no revenue loss because M/s.Sujana Metal Products Limited have...

Exemption u/s 11 - Violation of provisions of Section 13(1 )(c) and 13(1)(d) - loans and advances to interested persons - We are of the considered view that the learned...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - recording of satisfaction - penalty initiated u/s 143(3) order for concealment of particulars of income - penalty imposed for furnishing of...

To impose penalty u/s 271(1)(c), willful concealment is not an essential ingredient - HC

Profiteering - Sanitary Napkins - allegation proved that the reduction of rate of GST not passed on by way of commensurate reduction in prices - Contravention of section...

Levy of penalty - Profiteering - purchase of flat - It is apparent from the perusal of Section 122 (1) (i) that the violation of the provisions of Section 171 (1) is not...

Assessee neither challenged reopening nor has been able to disprove the finding of AO - penalty leviable u/s 271(1)(c) as assessee furnished inaccurate particulars and...

Quick Updates: