Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - there was no doubt on the issue that ...

Company Penalized for Misreporting Capital Expenditure as Revenue u/s 271(1)(c); Highlights Need for Accurate Tax Reporting.

April 18, 2015

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - there was no doubt on the issue that even when there is increase in the capital for the business of the company then also the expenditure would be capital in nature - penalty confirmed for wrong claim as revenue expenditure - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - there was no doubt on the issue that ...

Company Penalized for Misreporting Capital Expenditure as Revenue u/s 271(1)(c); Highlights Need for Accurate Tax Reporting.

April 18, 2015

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - merely for the reason that the said expenditure was claimed as a revenue expenditure would not justify imposition of penalty under Sec....

Capital expenditure or revenue expenditure - the expenditure incurred in regaining this profit company unit is in the nature of a capital expenditure and not the revenue...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Revenue expenditure or not - expenses on NPA’s - merely because the assessee has claimed the expenditure, which claim was not accepted or not...

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee company failed to provide bonafide explanation for inflated expenses claimed in revised return, contrary to audited...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Making an incorrect claim in law cannot tantamount to furnishing inaccurate particulars under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act. Mere making of a...

Levy of Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - The ITAT ruled that since there was no variation between the returned and assessed income, there was no concealment of income by the...

Product Development Expenditure disallowed - there is no distinction as to whether the expenditure incurred is capital or revenue, because while the provisions of...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Even if ld. AO has treated the amount as capital expenditure, certainly assessee will be entitled to claim depreciation but the crux is, it is...

Capital expenditure or Revenue expenditure - Demutualization expenses - It is true that such expansion of the capital base of the company was required to fulfill the...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was imposed despite the assessee withdrawing the exemption claim u/s 10(38) for Long Term Capital Gain (LTCG) on sale of penny stocks and offering...

The assessee claimed deduction for compensation paid to farmers for acquiring mining rights, which was an allowable expenditure. The Assessing Officer allowed the...

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) involved an addition based on estimation by the Assessing Officer, which was later re-estimated by the CIT(A) to disallow 10% of the...

Disallowance u/s 36(1)(iii) - claim of interest expenditure - The companies GIL and CNIL are subsidiary companies, which clearly indicates that the investment made by...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - forex loss was claimed as revenue expenditure - inadvertent claim of expenditure would not, ipso facto, amount to concealment of income...

Revenue expenditure versus capital expenditure - expenditure incurred on ERP Software – allowed as revenue expenditure - AT

Quick Updates: