Rectification of mistake - Merely because the assessee has ...

Section 254(2) Allows Error Correction in Tribunal Orders Despite Ongoing High Court Appeals by Assessee or Revenue.

April 30, 2015

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Rectification of mistake - Merely because the assessee has challenged the order of the Tribunal in an Appeal under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 before the High Court does not mean that the power under section (2) of section 254 cannot be invoked either by the assessee or by the revenue/Assessing Officer - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Rectification of mistake - Merely because the assessee has ...

Section 254(2) Allows Error Correction in Tribunal Orders Despite Ongoing High Court Appeals by Assessee or Revenue.

April 30, 2015

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

ITAT rejected Revenue's application for rectification under Section 254(2). The Tribunal determined that the application was essentially a disguised attempt to review...

The HC declined to entertain the petition challenging the Tribunal's decision under Section 254(2) regarding TP adjustment for guarantee fees paid to an Associated...

Rectification u/s 254 - non consideration of the Judgment of the Hon'ble Bombay High Court - When the Tribunal has no jurisdiction to review the order passed by them,...

Tribunal held that an order passed following binding precedents cannot be recalled or reviewed based on a subsequent contrary judgment of a higher court. Once an order...

Rectification u/s 254 - The High Court acknowledges that the Tribunal is the final authority to ascertain facts. However, it must rectify any apparent mistakes in its...

Rectification of mistake u/s 254 - failure to consider an argument advanced by either party for arriving at a conclusion is not an error apparent on the record, although...

HC set aside ITAT's rectification order under Section 254(2) of Income Tax Act, finding ITAT exceeded its jurisdiction in reviewing income classification. The dispute...

Rectification u/s 254 - non consideration of Tribunal decision in order which was referred and provided in paper book - an apparent error requiring necessary...

The HC held that the Tribunal erred in exercising jurisdiction u/s 254(2) to set aside the additions made by the AO regarding delayed payment of statutory dues like PF...

ITAT recalled its earlier order due to discovery of inadvertent errors, specifically the reliance on non-existing case laws identified during suo-moto review. Exercising...

Maintainability of appeal before HC - ITAT dismissed the appeal of the Revenue on the ground that tax effect does not exceed the monetary limit, i.e. tax effect of Rs....

The Tribunal held that in a case involving a requisition u/s 132A of the Act, the jurisdiction to complete the assessment is governed by the provisions of Section 153A....

Rectification u/s 254 - non consideration of certain grounds - there is an inadvertent mistake by the Tribunal in not disposing of grounds no.2, 3 and 6, which comes...

ITAT dismissed the assessee's miscellaneous application seeking rectification under section 254(2). The tribunal held that the application was essentially attempting to...

Rectification u/s mistake u/s 254 - apparent mistake in the order of Tribunal warranting rectification - scope of section 254(2) is limited to rectification of mistake...

Quick Updates: