When the entire demand covering the period October, 2002 to ...

Court Declines to Recalculate Minimal Demand from Oct 2002 to Dec 2006 Due to Insignificant Amount of Rs. 19,576.

May 26, 2015

Case Laws Service Tax AT

When the entire demand covering the period October, 2002 to December, 2006 is a meagre ₹ 19,576/- the demand for a mere 3 months will be pittance or less making it ridiculous to remand the case for computation thereof - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

When the entire demand covering the period October, 2002 to ...

Court Declines to Recalculate Minimal Demand from Oct 2002 to Dec 2006 Due to Insignificant Amount of Rs. 19,576.

May 26, 2015

Case Laws Service Tax AT

You may also like:

The appellant supplied gear boxes to Mega Power Projects and availed exemption benefit under Notification No. 06/2006-C.E. dated 01.03.2006. The adjudicating authority...

TP Adjustment - Arms length price adjustment on account of interest on external commercial borrowings - the rate of interest has been accepted by the Assessing Officer...

Challange to the bail granted by the HC - Money Laundering - scheduled offence - The High Court has neither considered the rigour of Section 45 of the PML Act, 2002 nor...

Vires of Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - At least four different High Courts have struck down the constitutional validity of Rule 8(3A) of Central Excise...

Res judicata principle applies - Department of Expenditure (DOE) not an 'enterprise' u/s 2(h) of Competition Act, 2002 - Office Memorandum (OM) issued by DOE not an...

Money Laundering - offence punishable u/s 3 - The said definition given in Section 3 of the PMLA, 2002 was later on clarified by adding explanation and as such it does...

Since Appellant were paying the duty utilizing the CENVAT Credit they cannot be charged for contravention of the provisions of Rule 4, 8(1), 8(3) & 8(3A) of the Central...

Impugned show cause notice for shortfall in service tax payment based on Rule 5(1) of Service Tax (Determination of Value) Rules, 2006 quashed as ultra vires Section 67...

Rectification of error - Period of limitation - The High Court observed that, there is no limitation prescribed for passing order under Section 22(4) of the TNVAT Act,...

Seeking grant of Anticipatory bail - Money Laundering - the observations made by the High Court that the provisions of Section 45 of the Act, 2002 shall not be...

Interpretation of statute - Overriding effect of provisions of MSMED Act, 2006 - A party who was not the “supplier” as per Section 2 (n) of the MSMED Act, 2006 on the...

HC affirmed ED's authority to conduct search, seizure, and account freezing operations under FEMA 1999 and PMLA 2002. Court held that interference during investigation...

The High Court examined the jurisdiction of the Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council to refer disputes between the parties for arbitration under the 2006 Act....

Service tax demand on Goods Transport Agency (GTA) services rendered on reverse charge basis set aside as appellant did not collect service tax from service recipient....

Reporting Entity under Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA)

Quick Updates: