Denial of SSI Exemption - Clandestine Removal - Tribunal was ...

Central Excise

August 18, 2015

Denial of SSI Exemption - Clandestine Removal - Tribunal was clearly in error in holding that merely because no appeal has been filed against M.S. Jain, all the other appeals cannot be maintained - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Denial of SSI Exemption - Clandestine Removal - Tribunal was ...

Central Excise

August 18, 2015

You may also like:

Clandestine removal - consumption of electricity - the charge of clandestine removal is to be established on examination of facts of each case and not merely on the...

Small scale (SSI) exemption - initial clearances at full rate of duty will not result in denial of SSI Exemption benefit for the entire period - AT

SSI exemption - dummy unit - clubbing of clearances - merely because they are doing business with each other's on commercial terms, cannot be held as dummy units - SSI...

Clandestine removal - MS Ingots - the findings of clandestine removal cannot be upheld based upon the third party documents, unless there is clinching evidence of...

Clandestine removal - The Tribunal proceeded merely on assumptions and presumptions and ignored the basic requirement of clinching material to prove the clandestine...

Clandestine removal - penalty - The unquestioned documentary evidence would suffice to establish the clandestine removal and the handling of such goods by M/s Royal...

Clandestine removal - penalty has rightly been imposed on the appellants for their collaborative role in the conspiracy of clandestine removal of goods by M/s HSAL and...

Clandestine removal - CENVAT credit Demand - Penalty - shortage of goods - Mere signing of the chart alleging removal of finished goods cannot be treated as clear...

Cenvat Credit - Clandestine removal - excess use of inputs - there are no justifiable reasons to deny the credit to the appellant merely on the basis of the input output ratio

Clandestine removal - merely on the basis of statement of employees it cannot be concluded that the imported raw material has not been used in manufacture by the Appellant.

Quick Updates: