Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights October 2015 Year 2015 This

Penalty u/s 271-E - The Add. CIT ought to have been conscious of ...


High Court Rules Penalty Order Invalid: Add. CIT Missed Deadline u/s 275(1)(c) for Section 271-E Penalty.

October 17, 2015

Case Laws     Income Tax     HC

Penalty u/s 271-E - The Add. CIT ought to have been conscious of the limitation u/s 275(1)(c), i.e., that no order of penalty could have been passed u/s 271-E after the expiry of the financial year in which the quantum proceedings were completed or beyond six months after the month in which they were initiated, whichever was later. - HC

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The key points are regarding the penalty imposed u/s 271D read with Section 269SS, and the issue of whether the penalty orders were time-barred. The Assessing Officer...

  2. Penalty u/s 271AAB - Defects in the notice issued u/s 274 - CIT(A) reduced the penalty to 10% applying provisions of Section 271AAB(a) of the Act as against penalty...

  3. Assessment against an entity that had ceased to exist prior to the initiation of proceedings. The effect of a change in name was considered a curable defect u/s 292B, as...

  4. Penalty u/s.271D & 271E - Period of limitation for imposing penalty u/s 275(1)(c) - he discussion by the AO in the assessment order and making reference to the Addl. CIT...

  5. Period of limitation for levy of penalty - Penalty proceedings u/s 271D - penalty order, was passed beyond the time period prescribed by Section 275(1)(c) - the same...

  6. Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - scope of Section 275(1A) - once substantial question of law against quantum additions are admitted by Hon’ble HC u/s 260A, the tribunal shall...

  7. The assessing officer (AO) is empowered u/s 275(1A) to revise the penalty order by giving a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee within six months from the...

  8. Penalty u/s 271(1) (c) - period of limitation - treatment of lease rent income - in the revised return, assessee claimed the same as income from house property to claim...

  9. Levy of penalty u/s 271C - Period of limitation - In the present case, since penalty u/s 271C has not been initiated during the course of any proceedings, first part of...

  10. Penalty u/s. 271B - Non furnishing of Tax Audit Report within the prescribed period u/s 44AB - Limitation to impose penalty u/s 275 - quantum of penalty to be imposed...

  11. The ITAT examined multiple aspects of a tax penalty case involving undisclosed income. The tribunal found no justification for penalty u/s 271(1)(c) across various...

  12. Penalty u/s 272A(2)(g) was levied for not issuing TDS certificates in Form 16A to deductees on time. The issue pertained to the period of limitation for issuing the...

  13. Period of limitation for passing the penalty order u/s 275(1)(a) - the limitation period for the levy of penalty will be as provided for under s. 275(1)(a), i.e., six...

  14. ITAT upheld penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) for concealment and furnishing inaccurate income particulars. The tribunal confirmed CIT's revision order under...

  15. Penalty u/s 271(1)(a) - limitation to pass penalty order - Limitation, it goes without saying, has to be fixed and certain. Section 275(1A) speaks of giving effect to...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates