Addition made towards bogus purchase of sulphur and cement - ...

Income Tax

November 7, 2015

Addition made towards bogus purchase of sulphur and cement - suppliers have been produced before the Learned AO under summons proceedings u/s 131 - Just because the suppliers had not brought their books of accounts during the course of summons proceeding, the assessee could not be faulted with - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Addition made towards bogus purchase of sulphur and cement - ...

Income Tax

November 7, 2015

You may also like:

Bogus purchases - addition made on the basis of Maharastra VAT authorities to the effect that assessee’s suppliers have issued bogus invoices without involving any...

Additions towards Bogus purchases - Estimation of profit - Purchases are to be removed, the corresponding sale is also required to be removed from the profit and loss...

Bogus purchases - In a case where sales are considered genuine, no addition, on account of bogus purchases, can be made - AT

Addition being unverified sundry debtors - Additions have been confirmed on account of bogus purchases - Any addition out of the sales made out of the aforesaid...

Bogus purchases - addition @ 12.5% of the bogus purchases - accommodation entries - no actual delivery of goods - notices issued u/s 133(6) were returned back unserved...

Estimation of income - additions towards unapproved creditors - once income is estimated, no additions can be made towards trade creditors which is arised out of such...

Addition made on account of bogus purchases - there cannot be a direct nexus between purchases and sales - in favour of assessee. - AT

Addition u/s 69C - bogus purchases - Enquiries conducted by the AO prove the fact that purchases from the above parties are bogus which are not supported by necessary...

Restriction of disallowance - Bogus purchases - Restriction of disallowance @30% of total disallowance – addition of 12.5% net profit on bogus purchase is reasonable - AT

Bogus Purchase - determinitation of income - Merely, it is pointed out that the assessee was a trader and ITAT retained 12.5% of the purchase towards its possible profit...

Quick Updates: