Revision u/s.263 - In absence of information at the time of ...

Income Tax

December 9, 2015

Revision u/s.263 - In absence of information at the time of completion of the assessment the AO could not have asked the assessee to explain the cash transactions - on the basis of a subsequent letter addressed to the AO, CIT could not have assumed jurisdiction u/s. 263 on this issue holding that the order of the AO is erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the revenue - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Revision u/s.263 - In absence of information at the time of ...

Income Tax

December 9, 2015

You may also like:

Revision u/s 263 - order cannot be passed by the CIT u/s 263 of the Act to ask the AO to decide whether the assessment order was erroneous or not - AT

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - limited scrutiny assessment - Based on the information mentioned in the revisionary order, the learned PCIT should have reprimanded the...

Revision u/s 263 - Deduction u/s 80IC - Since, AO had not expressed any view in that behalf as is discernible from the assessment order, revision order sustained.

Revision u/s 263 - AO while completing the assessment u/s 143(3) never applied his mind to various issues as pointed out by the CIT - revision upheld - AT

Revision u/s 263 - provisions of Section 68 as amended given retrospective operation - Asking for source of source can be relevant inquiry - Demands confirmed - HC

Revision u/s 263 - tds credit issue non examination by AO - non examination of an issue by the AO renders the assessment erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the revenue

Revision u/s 263 - Merely because the balance sheet and P&L account are placed before the AO at the time of assessment, it cannot be construed that the AO had verified...

Revision u/s 263 - Merely because that the AO did not discuss these details in the assessment order does not mean that he has not applied his mind.

Revision u/s 263 - claim of TDS - In the absence of any demonstrable loss of revenue, interference in exercise of power u/s 263 cannot be justified - AT

Revision u/s 263 - CIT setting aside the second reassessment order - time limit to take action u/s 263 - the necessity for the Commissioner to have substantial grounds...

Quick Updates: