Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights October 2017 Year 2017 This

Revision u/s 263 - Merely because that the AO did not discuss ...


Section 263 Clarifies AO's Duty: Lack of Detailed Discussion Doesn't Mean Lack of Consideration in Tax Assessments.

October 10, 2017

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

Revision u/s 263 - Merely because that the AO did not discuss these details in the assessment order does not mean that he has not applied his mind.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Invocation of Section 263 by the Principal Commissioner of Income-Tax (PCIT), alleging non-application of mind and lack of jurisdiction. The key points are: The...

  2. The Appellate Tribunal examined the issue of invoking revisional jurisdiction u/s 263 in a case involving receipts of accommodation entries and reopening of assessment....

  3. Revision u/s 263 - lack of inquiry by AO - it is a case where the AO did not make any inquiry vis-à-vis the share premium and simply accepted the details filed by the...

  4. Assessing Officer conducted due enquiries regarding cash deposits during demonetization period, called for details from assessee to substantiate source. AO applied mind,...

  5. Revision u/s 263 - error noted by the CIT that sale of properties by the assessee during the year was not examined by the AO vis-à-vis its stamp duty value for the...

  6. The Appellate Tribunal examined the validity of an order passed u/s 143(3) by the Assessing Officer (AO), which was revised by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax...

  7. The assessee's case was selected for limited scrutiny under CASS. The PCIT observed that the assessee, along with two co-owners, had purchased an immovable property...

  8. AO failed to conduct proper inquiries regarding genuineness of loan transactions for property acquisition. Bank statements revealed assessee lacked funds, payments made...

  9. The assessee was allowed deduction u/s 54/54F without proper examination of relevant details and materials. The Assessing Officer (AO) framed the assessment u/s 143(3)...

  10. Revision u/s 263 - PCIT issued the above show cause notice u/s 263 in respect of specified domestic transactions referred to in clause (i) of section 92BA of the Act...

  11. Revision u/s 263 - AO though made inquiry about the claim made by the assessee, however, not discussed the same while passing assessment order. - It can be seen from the...

  12. Revision u/s 263 - AO on merits has allowed the case u/s 54F of the Act in accordance with law. This cannot be a case for revision u/s 263 - A decision of the AO could...

  13. Revision u/s 263 involving excess deduction of transport expenses and non-deduction of TDS on transportation charges. CIT held AO failed to verify adequately, rendering...

  14. Revision u/s 263 - It is evident that A.O. made enquiries on the issue and assessee complied to the enquiries and filed all the required details. Thus, it is not a case...

  15. The assessee claimed exemption from long-term capital gains tax on the sale of agricultural land situated beyond the prescribed distance from municipal limits. The...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates