There is no dispute that the appellants were heard by one ...

Customs

December 15, 2015

There is no dispute that the appellants were heard by one Commissioner and the adjudication order was passed by another Commissioner, which is clear violation of principles of natural justice and hence the impugned order cannot be sustained on this ground alone. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

There is no dispute that the appellants were heard by one ...

Customs

December 15, 2015

You may also like:

Principles of natural justice - adjudication completed before scheduled date of hearing - the case on hand is one of violation of sub-clause 4 of Section 129 of the GST Act, 2017

Interpretation of statute - word ‘or’ is used in section 75(4) of the UPGST Act, 2017 - opportunity of personal hearing was not afforded - Relying on statutory...

Provisional attachment - power of competent authority to repeat the provisional attachment after period of one year - As the adjudication proceedings have begun, and the...

Initiation of CIRP - Operational Creditors - existence of pre-existing dispute or not - Careful reading of Section 8(2)(a) of the Code provides that the existence of...

Penalty of ₹ 10,000 imposed on the adjudicating authority / Commissioner for passing irresponsible adjudication orders defying the Tribunal's direction and...

Validity of adjudication order passed 17 months after the personal hearing was over -The show cause notice shall be adjudicated afresh and on appearance of the...

If one authority hears (PH) and other decides, then PH becomes an empty formality, fresh PH (personal hearing) is must

Detention of goods - first respondent directed to complete the adjudication within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment - HC

Scope of pronouncing of judgement - The law does not permit that the case is heard by one entity and the order is pronounced by another who has not heard the case at all....

Special Audit u/s 142(2A) - Personal appearance - proviso to Section 142(2A) does not envisage any personal hearing before an order under sub-section (2A) can be passed - HC

Quick Updates: