Levy of penalty on CHA for abetment - CHA appellant has onerous ...

Customs

January 16, 2016

Levy of penalty on CHA for abetment - CHA appellant has onerous responsibility to discharge which in the present circumstances he has failed to discharge and his culpability in the facts and circumstances cannot be ruled out. - Penalty levied - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Levy of penalty on CHA for abetment - CHA appellant has onerous ...

Customs

January 16, 2016

You may also like:

Revocation of CHA License - Misdeclaration of goods - the appellant totally failed to discharge its duties as CHA with utmost speed and efficiency and thereby grossly...

Levy of Penalty on appellant –CHA u/s 114(i) of the Customs Act - export of prohibited goods or not - appellant is negligent in performing their duty as a CHA - as the...

Levy of penalty for abetment - penalty cannot be imposed merely on the basis of assumption and presumption and without any basis - HC

Penalty on CHA - There was a serious lapse on part of the CHA in verifying the KYC before taking up the Custom clearance of consignment of rough diamond - levy of...

Revocation of CHA License - Forfeiture of security deposit - levy of penalty - The absence of seals and the discrepancy in weight pertained to containers delivered at...

Levy of penalty and redemption fine - export of prohibited goods - The appellant made a wrong claim of export benefit under MEIS, being mis-advised by the CHA. However,...

Imposition of penalty for abetment against the Chartered Accountant for giving wrong certificate - This action could not be described as an act to attract penalty under...

Provisional release of the goods - onerous conditions - department is not empowered to put onerous conditions for provisional release of seized goods. - HC

Levy of Penalty u/s 112 (a) of the Customs Act on the employees of CHA - The appellant was working as per the instructions given to him by his senior. There is no case...

Validity of conditional interim order - stay of recovery proceedings - The petitioner, being a Public Sector Company cannot be imposed with such onerous condition for...

Quick Updates: