Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights February 2016 Year 2016 This

Validity of the assessment - notice u/s.158BC(c) has not been ...


Taxpayer's Response to Notice Bars Claim of Improper Service u/s 158BC(c.

February 22, 2016

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

Validity of the assessment - notice u/s.158BC(c) has not been properly served - Once the assessee has been served the notice and in compliance to the same the assessee has responded by filing the return, now he cannot take a ground that the service of notice is improper. - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. HC held that uploading GST show cause notices solely in the 'Additional Notices and Orders' portal tab without clear navigation instructions constituted improper service....

  2. The taxpayer, an IT/support services provider, received reimbursements from its associated enterprises (AEs) for the cost of providing such services. The tax authorities...

  3. Section 80P deduction claim filed in a return submitted in response to notice u/s 142(1) is valid. The Income Tax Act does not mandate that the return must be filed u/ss...

  4. Validity of assessment - Non service of notice u/s 143(2) - unless there is service of notice in accordance with provision under Section 282 of the Act separately...

  5. The HC quashed the impugned order where a demand notice was challenged for improper service. Following Anhad Impex precedent, the Court found that notices uploaded under...

  6. This case deals with the validity of a declaration under the Voluntary Compliance Encouragement Scheme (VCES) for service tax dues. The taxpayer was issued a show cause...

  7. HC determined the show-cause notice and Order-in-Original under Finance Act, 1994 were invalid due to improper service procedures under Section 37C of Central Excise...

  8. HC held that reopening of assessment under Section 147 was improper. The AO lacked sufficient material to demonstrate income escaping assessment, as the taxpayer had...

  9. Rebate claim – refund claim was time barred - rebate claim was rightly rejected as time barred but the re-credit of duty paid in Cenvat account is not admissible - CGOVT

  10. Time limitation for filing refund claim is one year from relevant date as per Section 11B of Central Excise Act, 1944 made applicable to service tax under Finance Act,...

  11. ITAT affirmed CIT(A)'s directive to grant TDS credit per Form 26AS despite taxpayer's initial failure to claim full credit in tax return due to software technical issues....

  12. HC determined that typographical error in address on notice under s.148 of IT Act does not invalidate reassessment proceedings. Taxpayer's claim for India-Singapore DTAA...

  13. FORM GSTR-9A - Annual Return (For Composition Taxpayer) - Goods and Services Tax

  14. Refund of service tax - double payment of service tax was made - when service tax is paid by mistake a claim for refund cannot be barred by limitation, merely because...

  15. HC allows taxpayer's challenge to tax determination order under CGST/KSGST Acts. The court found that service of show cause notice and tax order through an additional...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates