Revision u/s 263 - AO has to consider the provisions applicable ...

AO's Order Flawed for Ignoring Rule 8D; Revision u/s 263 Justified for Revenue's Interest.

March 10, 2016

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Revision u/s 263 - AO has to consider the provisions applicable under Rule 8D effective from assessment year 2008-09. But the AO made disallowance by following Co-ordinate Bench decision for earlier assessment year. It is apparent from facts and circumstances the order of the Assessing Officer is erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of Revenue - Revision proceedings are correct - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Revision u/s 263 - AO has to consider the provisions applicable ...

AO's Order Flawed for Ignoring Rule 8D; Revision u/s 263 Justified for Revenue's Interest.

March 10, 2016

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - The phrase prejudicial to the interest of revenue has to be read in conjunction with an erroneous order passed by the A.O. Every loss of...

Revision u/s 263 - valuation of closing stock, non increasing of closing stock by proportionate other direct expenses - The alleged under valuation of closing stock is a...

Revision u/s 263 - unexplained cash deposit during the demonization period - The tribunal noted that the AO had conducted an adequate inquiry into the assessee's cash...

Revision u/s 263 - claim of TDS - In the absence of any demonstrable loss of revenue, interference in exercise of power u/s 263 cannot be justified - AT

Revision u.s 263 - assessment order passed pursuant to the revisionary order has resulted in reduction of tax liability - not prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue...

AO failed to conduct proper inquiries regarding genuineness of loan transactions for property acquisition. Bank statements revealed assessee lacked funds, payments made...

Revision u/s 263 - any loss of revenue as a consequence of an order passed by the Assessing Officer cannot be treated as prejudicial to the interests of revenue - AT

The Commissioner's invocation of Section 263 for revision of the assessment order was unjustified as the twin conditions of the order being erroneous and prejudicial to...

Validity of revision u/s 263 - subsequent revision orders - first order set aside by PCIT - ITAT quashing revisionary proceedings - adoption of accrual basis of...

Revision u/s 263 - CIT setting aside the second reassessment order - time limit to take action u/s 263 - the necessity for the Commissioner to have substantial grounds...

Revision u/s 263 - Invocation of revision proceedings for the second time - As pertinent to point out that there was no bar on limitation by the ld. PCIT to invoke...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - We find that the assessment order qua the deduction under section 80(9)(2)(d) of the Act on account of interest earned from Surat Co-operative...

AO failed to examine details, relied solely on assessee's submissions, resulting in erroneous assessment prejudicial to Revenue's interests. Assessee borrowed...

Revision u/s 263 - Every loss of revenue as a consequence of an order of AO cannot be treated as prejudicial to the interests of the revenue, for example, when an...

Revision u/s 263 - Issue considered and decided in appeal by appellate authorities, such matters cannot be subject to revision u/s 263. Rationale behind exclusion of...

Quick Updates: