Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights March 2016 Year 2016 This

Validity of exercising jurisdiction u/s.263 - Application of the ...


Jurisdiction Validity u/s 263: Income Diversion, Inherited Assets, and State vs. Taxpayer Prejudice Explained.

March 10, 2016

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

Validity of exercising jurisdiction u/s.263 - Application of the principle of diversion of income by overriding title - transfer of capital asset inherited - The line of difference between ss. 263 and 264 is that while the former can be invoked to remove the prejudice caused to the State the latter can be invoked to remove the prejudice caused to the assessee. - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Refund of CGST & SGST wrongly paid - Interpretation of the term “subsequently held” - the term “subsequently held” in section 77 of CGST Act, 2017 or under section 19 of...

  2. The summary highlights the key difference between the scope of total income under the Income Tax Act and the Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and...

  3. Revision u/s 263 - The argument of the petitioner that the assessment order was not prejudicial to the interest of revenue and therefore the proceeding under Section 263...

  4. When the Income-tax Officer stated that full expenditure had been allowed in the year of acquisi tion of the assets, what he really meant was that the amount spent on...

  5. Assumption of jurisdiction u/s 153A was challenged due to unexplained credit u/s 68. Share capital, being a liability, cannot be treated as an asset to invoke...

  6. The Appellate Tribunal reviewed a case involving a revision u/s 263 related to deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i). The AO allowed interest income from FD investments as a...

  7. Revision u/s 263 by CIT - As both the issues in question on the basis of which the Pr.CIT had assumed jurisdiction u/s 263 of the Act had been considered and decided in...

  8. Revision u/s 263 - if the transfer of asset is to be assessed under the head `income from business’ necessarily, the provisions of section 43CA would have application...

  9. Revision u/s 263 by CIT - Applicability of Higher rate of tax u/s 115BBE on surrendered income - The applicability of the amended provision of section 115BBE of the Act,...

  10. Revision u/s 263 - The failure to compute assessee’s income u/s 115JB, in our considered opinion, would certainly make the order liable for exercise of revisional...

  11. The High Court held that the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) lacked jurisdiction to pass an order u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act in this case. The Assessing...

  12. Validity of Revision u/s 263 - Admisibility of Deduction u/s 80P, Deduction from total income under chapter VI-A and business expenses - The ITAT quashed the order...

  13. Revision u/s 263 by CIT - rental income which had been shown as “Income from Business & Profession” rather than showing the same as “Income from House Property” - once...

  14. Revision u/s 263 - AS 7 - construction of asset - block of asset is not restricted to building machinery plant or furniture but is extended to know-how patents Copyright...

  15. u/s 263, the AO had not made any addition regarding cash deposits in the assessee company's bank account and unsecured loan received during the year under consideration,...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates