Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - by disallowing 80% of the claim, the ...

Income Tax

March 26, 2016

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - by disallowing 80% of the claim, the Assessing Officer has allowed 20% of expenditure attributable to earn the business income. - levy of penalty is not warranted - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - by disallowing 80% of the claim, the ...

Income Tax

March 26, 2016

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The Appellate Tribunal observed that the appellant, during reassessment proceedings, had filed their return of income but failed to provide...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(C) - deemed income being loss claimed and disallowed - The AO has also not specified the charge on which penalty is being levied - No penalty - AT

Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – the penalty imposed for disallowing claim of expenditure on foreign education and foreign travelling cannot be upheld - AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - when the Assessing Officer is not able to prove that the assessee was guilty of fraud or gross or willful negligence, penalty cannot be sustained - AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - the assessment order, by a fiction of law, is deemed to constitute satisfaction of the Assessing Officer for initiation of penalty proceedings - HC

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) - assessee had failed to provide full submissions - penalty levied by the Assessing Officer u/s 271(1)(b) of the IT Act deserves to be...

Revision u/sec. 263 - CIT has exceeded his jurisdiction in directing the Assessing Officer to initiate penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - AT

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - recording of specific finding or not? - In para 7 of the penalty order u/s. 271(1)(c), the Assessing Officer held that it is found to be a fit...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(C) - exemption u/s 80-IC - income in the garb of fictitious cash sales - Assessing Officer as well as the Appellate Authority, rightly gave...

Levy of penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - Addition of LTCG - Assessing Officer while recording satisfaction has invoked both the charges of section 271(1)(c) - ambiguity and...

Quick Updates: