Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Where the AO is not clear whether ...

Income Tax

May 10, 2016

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Where the AO is not clear whether penalty is levied for concealment of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars, then such an order suffers from non-application of mind and cannot be upheld in law - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Where the AO is not clear whether ...

Income Tax

May 10, 2016

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Penalty order did not specify the particular limb under which penalty u/s 271(1)(c) is levied. AO has not specified that penalty is either levied...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - the mere disallowance under section 43B would not amount to concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars of income - no penalty.

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - furnished wrong particulars of its income in terms of profits u/s 115JB - Computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) - levy of penalty confirmed - AT

Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - AO has not unearthed any new fact from his independent sources which could lead to furnishing of inaccurate particulars by the assessee...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act – Inaccurate particulars furnished - different stands taken before the AO and appellate authority - assessee did not come out clean -...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(C) - deemed income being loss claimed and disallowed - The AO has also not specified the charge on which penalty is being levied - No penalty - AT

Validity of the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) or 158BFA - AO has levied the penalty under section 271(1)(C) of the Act by observing that the assessee has concealed/furnished...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - As a matter of fact the notice issued u/s 274 read with section 271 of the Act itself was ambiguous as it did not make it clear as to under which...

Assessee neither challenged reopening nor has been able to disprove the finding of AO - penalty leviable u/s 271(1)(c) as assessee furnished inaccurate particulars and...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) on addition made u/s 68 - the assessee has given sufficient explanation though not found satisfactory by AO - No merit in levying penalty.

Quick Updates: