The contention of the appellant that once the case against main ...

Central Excise

May 14, 2016

The contention of the appellant that once the case against main noticees is settled in Settlement Commission, a case against all other noticees stands settled, is not correct - if the liability of the co-noticees arise from different act they will not get immunity from further proceeding. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

The contention of the appellant that once the case against main ...

Central Excise

May 14, 2016

You may also like:

Maintainability of Application for Settlement application - co-applicant - Since he is not the main applicant in the present case, he will not be debarred from...

Import of Crude Palm Oil, meant for use in manufacture of soap - Violation of import condition - diversion of goods to open market instead of using the same for the...

Where against main noticee/defaulter, the Settlement Commission has granted immunity from payment of any penalty, no penalty can be imposed upon other co-noticees - HC

Penalty imposed u/s 112(a) - Import confectionary items from Dubai - immunity from prosecution and fine/penalty - Tribunal held that since the appellant was a co-noticee...

Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices relating to Securities Market - Settlement Regulations - SEBI should reconsider and seriously give a thought in coming out with a...

Validity of order passed by Settlement Commission - Unless the twin conditions mentioned therein are fulfilled, the Settlement Commission cannot move further in the...

Settlement of case - before submitting reply to the show cause notice, approached the Settlement Commission - The dismissal of the application filed before the...

Demand of interest on reversal of CENVAT Credit - simply because the case was settled by Settlement Commission interest provision will not vary, Rule 14 is applicable...

Rejection of request for waiver of interest while granting immunity from penalty and prosecution - order of Settlement Commission - the liability of the Petitioner to...

Validity of order of Settlement Commission - acceptance of additional income disclosed by the assessee - Petitioner/Income Tax authority could not make out any...

Validity of the application filed u/s 245(C) - Settlement Commission - the prime consideration and pre-condition for entertaining an application is true and full...

Penalty u/s under Section 112 (a) - Forged license of DEPB - the question as to who played the main role is irrelevant for the reason that once the case is settled by...

Validity of reopening of assessment - An order u/s 245D(4) already been passed by the Income Tax Settlement Commission (ITSC) - Scope of harmonious construction - The...

Challenge against the order passed by the Settlement Commission - reason behind the creation of Settlement Commission is to give a quietus to the dispute between the two...

Validity of Settlement Commission orders - The case involved petitions seeking directives for the issuance of formal orders under section 245D (4) of the Income Tax Act,...

Quick Updates: