Rejection of refund claim - EDD - 1% extra duty deposit - EDD is ...

Refund Claim for 1% Extra Duty Deposit Rejected; EDD Not Subject to Unjust Enrichment Doctrine for Refunds.

November 24, 2016

Case Laws Customs AT

Rejection of refund claim - EDD - 1% extra duty deposit - EDD is in the form of security and the doctrine of ‘unjust enrichment’ is not applicable in the case of refund of EDD - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Rejection of refund claim - EDD - 1% extra duty deposit - EDD is ...

Refund Claim for 1% Extra Duty Deposit Rejected; EDD Not Subject to Unjust Enrichment Doctrine for Refunds.

November 24, 2016

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

The High Court held that the rejection of refund claim for Extra Duty Deposit (EDD) paid by the petitioner was unjustified. The EDD amount collected during Special...

The appellant is entitled to refund of the amount deposited 'under protest' during the pendency of adjudication proceedings and investigation, as it cannot be considered...

Denial of refund claim - Unjust enrichment - Duty paid twice - e appellants are entitled for refund claim for duty paid on Ethanol - unjust enrichment is not applicable - AT

Show cause notice demanding interest was confirmed by the original Adjudicating Authority and settled under SVLDRS Scheme, thus refund of the confirmed amount does not...

Refund claim of excess duty paid - unjust enrichment - after issuance of corrigendum the excess duty, paid lacks the colour of duty and is merely a deposit - the excess...

HC held that Extra Duty Deposit (EDD) does not constitute customs duty under Section 27 of Customs Act, 1962, but rather functions as a security deposit as clarified in...

Refund claims – unjust enrichment – service tax paid under protest – refund allowed - AT

Pre deposit made by VODAFONE shall not be subject to the doctrine of unjust enrichment

Refund claim rejected – Unjust enrichment - the appellant’s have not recovered the amounts of duties from their customers so as to attract the unjust enrichment principles - AT

The appellant filed bills of entry claiming exemption under Notification No. 46/2011-Cus, which was denied during re-assessment. The Commissioner (Appeals) rectified...

Refund claim - unjust enrichment - Merely because it was shown as expenditure, the department cannot contend that pre-deposit made by appellant is hit by unjust...

Refund claim - unjust enrichment - Initially claim filed without challenging the self-assessed Bills of Entry - During the appeal process, the appellant sought to amend...

Refund of Service Tax paid - unjust enrichment - any amount deposited during the pendency of adjudication or investigation is in the nature of a deposit and, therefore,...

The case involved a refund claim for duty paid under protest, rejected on the ground of unjust enrichment. The appellant paid duty under protest and filed a refund claim...

Refund of service tax paid - unjust enrichment - Commissioner (Appeals) has upheld the order of original authority rejecting the refund claim on the ground of unjust...

Quick Updates: