Revision u/s 263 - In the present case the petitioner had ...

Department Failed to Serve Notice at Petitioner's Updated Address Despite Prior Notification.

December 13, 2016

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Revision u/s 263 - In the present case the petitioner had informed the department as to its address before the initiation of proceeding. Therefore it was obligatory on the part of the department to attempt to serve notice at the new address. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Revision u/s 263 - In the present case the petitioner had ...

Department Failed to Serve Notice at Petitioner's Updated Address Despite Prior Notification.

December 13, 2016

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

Validity of the assessment framed u/s 147 - Proof of service of notice - There was no valid service of notice u/s 148 of the Act in the present case. The finding of the...

Detention order at pre-execution stage was challenged on grounds of non-service at Nepal address, despite knowledge of address. Court relied on Supreme Court's ruling in...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - non appearance before the Assessing Officer - AO kept an issuing notices on the wrong address even when the first notice was not served...

Revocation of CHA License - appellant failed to verify the address at which the two clients operated and that requirement of ‘know your customer (KYC)’ was entirely...

Validity of reassessment order - Notice sent on wrong (old) E-mail ID - The petitioner company had two email addresses, one used until 2019 and another operational since...

Service of SCN - SCN not sent at proper address - The department was fully aware that the appellant is not residing and not available in the address - After the Show...

The appellant manufactured polyester staple fiber (PSF) using PET bottles scrap (90%) and popcorn waste (less than 10%). The department denied the nil/concessional duty...

Validity of reopening of assessment - service of notice - Since no one was on behalf of the assessee was available at the given address, therefore, notice was served by...

Reassessment - notice served at old address - the new address was very much available on the record of the Assessing Officer on which earlier notices u/s 143(2) dated 22....

Prior period expenditure - when prior period income is taxed prior period expenditure cannot be disallowed - AT

Condonation of delay in filing of appeal - Service of order - order was sent to old address - Revenue’s main contention is that the orders were served at the address...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - non compliance of notices u/s 142(1) - the AO was not having the present address of the assessee - when the notice issued u/s 142(1) was not...

The Appellate Tribunal addressed the issue of notice being sent to the wrong address, leading to an ex-parte order by the CIT(A) due to improper service. The CIT(A)...

The case pertains to the refund of service tax paid on input services utilized for the export of 'Cut and Polished Diamonds' during October 2015 to March 2016, as per...

The Appellate Tribunal set aside the ex-parte order of the CIT(A) due to notices not being served on the assessee during the appellate proceedings because of address...

Quick Updates: