The criminal case is decided on the basis of evidence adduced ...

Central Excise

February 1, 2017

The criminal case is decided on the basis of evidence adduced therein and cannot be rejected on the basis of evidence in departmental proceedings and therefore, both proceedings pending before the CESTAT and the trial court shall go on simultaneously and there is no impediment for the same - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

The criminal case is decided on the basis of evidence adduced ...

Central Excise

February 1, 2017

You may also like:

Clandestine Removal - Levy of penalty - If on the basis of the evidences adduced which would be of the nature as enumerated at (ii) of para 40 of the said decision, the...

Proof of smuggling of goods - DW.1 (revenue officer) stated in evidence that it was suspected that articles were smuggled and that it was believed that the articles were...

Law for trial of the cross cases - Raid - In the present controversy, two different criminal appeals were being heard and decided against two different judgments based...

Dishonor of Cheque - legally enforceable debt or not - Since the accused rebutted the presumption whatever arisen by adducing oral and documentary evidence, the onus...

Dishonor of cheque - mismatch of signatures or incomplete signatures - The Supreme Court in a case has came to the conclusion that criminal prosecution against the...

Dishonor of Cheque - initiation of Criminal Case - Whether a criminal case initiated under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act, after ending in conviction and reach...

Dishonor of Cheque - Ascertaining nature of transaction - whether a criminal proceeding can be initiated and an accused held guilty when there is already a civil court...

Extended period of limitation - Reversal of CENVAT Credit - It is well settled law that onus is on the Department to prove that extended period of limitation is...

Seeking grant of bail - Money Laundering - proceeds of crime - Ultimately, the consideration has to be made on a case to case basis, on the facts. The primary object is...

Seizure of tobacco and loss of the same due to file - Liability of central excise department - Whether the Trial Court has committed error of facts and law in passing...

It is true that the respondent has made many allegations of malpractices. But the cases are not decided on the basis of allegation. In the final order, the matters are...

Nature of services can not be decided on the basis of registration certificate - The nature of service rendered by the assessee is a question of fact decided on the...

Validity of assessment u/s 153A - Non issuance of notice U/s 143(2) - Protective assessment - the assessment has been made on a protective basis, but, it is not clear...

Clandestine Removal - reliability of statements - sufficiency of evidence or not - In a serious case such as evasion of duty by fraud, the degree of appreciation of...

The Court should not decide a criminal case against the accused in the absence of his counsel since an accused in a criminal case should not suffer for the fault of his...

Quick Updates: