Imposition of penalty u/r 26 of CER, 2002 - there is nothing on ...

Penalty u/r 26 of Central Excise Rules 2002 Set Aside Due to Lack of Evidence Against ICICI Bank.

March 28, 2017

Case Laws Central Excise AT

Imposition of penalty u/r 26 of CER, 2002 - there is nothing on record to evidence the fact that ICICI Bank has played any role in getting the forged certificate - penalty set aside - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Imposition of penalty u/r 26 of CER, 2002 - there is nothing on ...

Penalty u/r 26 of Central Excise Rules 2002 Set Aside Due to Lack of Evidence Against ICICI Bank.

March 28, 2017

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

Penalty imposed u/r 26 of Central Excise Rules 2002 set aside due to violation of principles of natural justice and lack of evidence. Department's case based solely on...

Penalty u/r 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - appellant was Director during relevant period - Since the demand of the duty has already been settled under SVLDRS...

Penalty - Bogus invoice issued without selling the goods – penalty would be attracted under Rule 25 (1) (d) as well as Rule 26(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - AT

Levy of penalty in the absence of confiscation - penalty under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 even in case where there is no proposal for confiscation can be...

Penalty under Rule 26(1) of Central excise rules 2002 - Bogus Cenvatable invoices issued - the appellant was liable to pay penalty - AT

Since Appellant were paying the duty utilizing the CENVAT Credit they cannot be charged for contravention of the provisions of Rule 4, 8(1), 8(3) & 8(3A) of the Central...

Penalty u/r 26(1) of Central Excise Rules, 2002 - charge of abating the evasion of duty by the Main Party - The appellant argued that since the main party's case of duty...

Levy of penalty on Proprietor of the Firm under Rule 26(2) of Central Excise Rules, 2002 - fraudulent availment of CENVAT Credit - Taking note of the fact that penalty...

Penalty on directors - Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules - Rule 26 is prima facie in excess of the Rule making power conferred under the Central Excise Act, 1944 - HC

Revocation of registration under Central Excise - Revocation of registration, not provided for in Central Excise Rules, 2002 and only in exercise of power of Central...

Penalty under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - Contravention of Rule 8(3A) - penalty under Rule 25 is not permissible, but penalty under Rule 27 is to be imposed - AT

Imposition of penalty u/r 26(2) of CER, 2002 - CENVAT Credit - Wrong availment of credit and reversal thereof on being pointed out before the issue of SCN - maximum...

Vires of Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - At least four different High Courts have struck down the constitutional validity of Rule 8(3A) of Central Excise...

Confiscation of land, buildings etc. - invocation of powers under Rule 173(Q)(2) of Central Excise Rules, 1944 on 26.03.2007 and 29.03.2007 for confiscation of land,...

Clandestine removal of excisable goods - Penalty u/r 26 of Central Excise Rules, 2002 imposed on Managing Director. Appellant challenged Order upholding penalty without...

Quick Updates: