Penalty levied U/s. 271(1)(c) - false claim of exemption of LTCG ...

Income Tax

April 22, 2017

Penalty levied U/s. 271(1)(c) - false claim of exemption of LTCG u/s 10(38) - mere making of a claim, which is not sustainable in law, by itself, will not amount to furnishing inaccurate particulars regarding the income of the assessee - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty levied U/s. 271(1)(c) - false claim of exemption of LTCG ...

Income Tax

April 22, 2017

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Making an incorrect claim in law cannot tantamount to furnishing inaccurate particulars under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act. Mere making of a...

Penalty U/s. 271(1)(c) - claim of exemption u/s 10(38) whereas sale of shares was not through stock exchange - company adopted LIFO method where as AO adopted FIFO...

Bogus LTCG - genuineness of transaction not proved - exemption u/s 10(38) - assessee failed to prove genuineness of transaction and long-term capital gain on sale of...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - A mere making of the claim, which is not sustainable in law, by itself, will not amount to furnishing inaccurate particulars regarding the income...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Whether 'mens rea' or deliberate attempt is not essential for levy of penalty - A mere making of the claim, which is not sustainable in law, by...

Exemption u/s 10(38) - LTCG - general insurance business - In the present assessment year the ld AO has himself allowed exemption u/s 10(15)(iv)(h) of the Act in regard...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - surrendered undisclosed income during the search and seizure - assessee contented that income disclosed in the return U/s 139(1) though claimed...

Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – mere admission of appeal by the High Court is sufficient to debar the penalty levied u/s.271(1)(c) of the Act - AT

Bogus LTCG - Disallowing exemption u/s 10(38) - penny stock - The said company held as a penny stock company by the authorities below without any corroborative evidence...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - the assessee had declared LTCG and had claimed it as exempt u/s 10(38) as it suffered STT but subsequently withdrew the claim - at the most it...

Quick Updates: