Penalty u/s 78 - the respondent has collected the service tax ...

Penalty Imposed for Failing to Remit Service Tax Despite Rural Location and Limited Education u/s 78.

May 25, 2017

Case Laws Service Tax AT

Penalty u/s 78 - the respondent has collected the service tax from the client and not paid to Revenue - The reason given by the Commissioner (Appeals) for non-imposition of penalty is that the respondent was in a rural area and not very highly educated - order of commissioner (appeal) is not correct - penalty confirmed - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 78 - the respondent has collected the service tax ...

Penalty Imposed for Failing to Remit Service Tax Despite Rural Location and Limited Education u/s 78.

May 25, 2017

Case Laws Service Tax AT

You may also like:

Non-discharge of service tax - extended period invoked, service tax demanded - penalties imposed u/ss 77 and 78 of Finance Act, 1994 - appellant providing taxable...

Levy of penalty u/s 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 - evasion of service tax - appellant collected service tax from the service receivers but failed to deposit the...

Services rendered by appellant classified as works contract services, attracting service tax liability. Appellant failed to obtain service tax registration and pay...

Dispute regarding non-payment/short payment of service tax, tax demand and interest u/ss 73(2) and 75, penalties u/ss 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, and extended...

Levy of penalty - in case of confirmation of demand u/s 73(A) there is no application of Section 76 and 78 for imposition of penalty. Therefore, the adjudicating...

Levy of IGST - Export of services or not - telecom services - Place of supply - international Inbound Roaming Services (IIR) and International Long Distance (ILD)...

Since the penalties imposed under Section 76 is upheld, penalties imposed under Section 78 cannot be justified, Hence the penalties imposed u/s 78 is set aside - In the...

Finance Bill, 2015 - service tax - Substantial overall in levy of penalty u/s 76 and 78

Penalty u/s 78 - failure to discharge tax - Construction services - both the authorities below have rightly imposed and upheld penalty under section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994.

Service tax demand and interest were raised on the amount towards provident fund. Penalties u/ss 76, 77, and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 were imposed. The extended...

Penalty u/s 78 of the FA, 1994 - appellant had correctly advised not to challenged the invocation of the extended period of limitation for recovery of service tax though...

Levy of penalty u/s 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 - No independent reasons have been given by the first appellate authority to confirm the penalty under Section 78 of the...

Imposition of penalties - Mere collection and delay to remit to the Government cannot be considered as an act of suppression - The penalty imposed u/s 78 is unwarranted.

Reduction of penalty u/s 78 of FA - non-payment of service tax - appellant has not recorded the said transactions in their specified records - Penalty reduced to 50% of...

The case pertains to the levy of service tax under the reverse charge mechanism (RCM) on rental payments made by a company to its directors for renting immovable...

Quick Updates: