Penalty u/s. 271D - contravention of provision of Section 269SS ...

Income Tax

August 11, 2017

Penalty u/s. 271D - contravention of provision of Section 269SS - reasonable cause for not accepting loans by way of account payee cheque or demand draft - These loans are genuine transaction which were accepted by way of cheques by its sister concern - No penalty

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s. 271D - contravention of provision of Section 269SS ...

Income Tax

August 11, 2017

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 271D - reasonable cause - contravention of sec. 269SS - cash was taken by discounting cheques to meet the urgent business needs of the assessee - deletion of...

Penalty u/s 271D - accepting loan in cash - reasonable cause - the AO has neither doubted the impugned transaction nor any addition made in this behalf even under...

Penalty levied u/s. 271D r.w.s. 273B - reasonable cause for the assessee to accept loan over ₹ 20,000/- in cash - levy of penalty confirmed.

Penalty u/s 271D - reasonable cause - mere proof regarding genuineness of the transaction or the intention in accepting the amounts in cash or that there was no attempt...

Levy of penalty u/s. 271D - violating the provisions of section 269SS - Assessee is a Co-operative credit society and has accepted cash deposits from its members -...

Penalty u/s 271D - receipt in cash being undisclosed income - Loan or advance is a sine qua non or foundational fact for the applicability of the provisions of Section...

Penalty u/s 271D - Acceptance of loan in Cash by the appellant firm from its agriculturist customer - violation of provisions of section 269SS - penalty confirmed - HC

Penalty u/s 271D - whether provisions of section 269SS are attracted to the amounts received from sister concern - no penalty - HC

Penalty levied u/s 271D - accepting unsecured loan above ₹ 20,000/- violating provisions of section 269SS - In the present times the bank transfers are quick...

Penalty u/s 271D - default u/s 269SS - assessee has taken loan from his father and paternal aunt, who are family members and such transactions would not attract penalty u/s 271D

Quick Updates: