Penalty levied u/s.271(1)(c) - Initiation of penalty proceedings ...

Income Tax

December 28, 2017

Penalty levied u/s.271(1)(c) - Initiation of penalty proceedings in this case done in a general sense and the levy of penalty is done for both the limbs and such orders are bad in law. Usage of expressions like “or” and “and” confirm the ‘ambiguity’ in the mind of AO. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty levied u/s.271(1)(c) - Initiation of penalty proceedings ...

Income Tax

December 28, 2017

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Validity of notice - It is a well settled proposition of law that penalty cannot be initiated for the limb, which is different from the limb for...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - the assessment order, by a fiction of law, is deemed to constitute satisfaction of the Assessing Officer for initiation of penalty proceedings - HC

Penalty levied u/s 271(1) (c) - Defective notice - When the AO has not applied his mind at the time of initiation of penalty proceedings by satisfying himself if it is a...

Penalty levied under section 271(1)(c) - AO has initiated penalty proceedings under one default or limb of section 271(1)(c) of the Act, but levied for another default...

Levy fo Penalty - AO failed to strike off either of the limbs of section 271(1)(c), which are not satisfied by the assessee and consequently, notice issued under section...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - defective notice - AO is under obligation to specify the appropriate limb of clause (c) of section 271(1) at the time of initiation as well as at...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – Tribunal proceeded on hyper- technicalities and acted as though every seizure must entail initiation of proceedings u/s 271 of the Act - no penalty - HC

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Penalty order did not specify the particular limb under which penalty u/s 271(1)(c) is levied. AO has not specified that penalty is either levied...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) - AO has not applied his mind before initiating the penalty proceedings rather borrowed his satisfaction from the “tax...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(C) - Notice issued by the Assessing Officer u/s 274 r.w.s 271(1)(c) of the Act to be bad in law as it did not specify which limb of section 271(1)(c)...

Quick Updates: