Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Even if it is presumed that assessee was ...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Not Justified Despite Assumed Ineligibility for Depreciation Allowance.

February 19, 2018

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Even if it is presumed that assessee was not eligible for allowance of depreciation even then the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) cannot be imposed - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Even if it is presumed that assessee was ...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Not Justified Despite Assumed Ineligibility for Depreciation Allowance.

February 19, 2018

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Penalty being 300% by invoking Section 271(1)(c) - return was revised before completion of assessment - Revenue is not justified in imposing penalty under Section 271(1)(c) - HC

Monetary limit for filing of appeal by revenue in case of penalty - Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) on bogus purchases - Quantum proceedings and penalty proceedings are...

The Assessing Officer (AO) consciously deleted irrelevant portions from the show cause notice, mentioning only the charge of furnishing inaccurate particulars of income....

No penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was imposed on the assessee for disallowance of depreciation. The ITAT held that the assessee did not deliberately claim depreciation with an...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of bogus purchases by applying the profit rate - Once there is no reason to disbelieve the sales made by the assessee and...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Mandation of specification of charge - It is clear that for the AO to assume jurisdiction u/s 271(1)(c), proper notice is necessary and the...

Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for two types of additions: (1) the addition made u/s 50C on the difference between stamp duty value and sale...

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - recording of specific finding or not? - In para 7 of the penalty order u/s. 271(1)(c), the Assessing Officer held that it is found to be a fit...

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee company failed to provide bonafide explanation for inflated expenses claimed in revised return, contrary to audited...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of excessive depreciation - cost of acquisition of wind mill - whether or not assessee is entitled to the benefit under proviso to...

This case deals with the levy of penalties u/ss 271AAA and 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act in relation to various additions made to the assessee's income based on seized...

Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - disallowance of depreciation - he explanation given by the assessee for the claim of depreciation is neither bona fide nor...

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Failure of the assessee to explain the source of cash deposit in the bank account - burden of proof - The ITAT acknowledged the...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - As the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Act leviable without taking the approval from the Joint/Additional Commissioner of Income Tax,...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) and / or 272A(1)(d) - assessee failed to comply notice under Section 142(1) - The assessment order was passed u/s 143(3) and not under...

Quick Updates: