Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights March 2018 Year 2018 This

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - AO has levied the penalty without ...


Assessing Officer's Premature Penalty Imposition u/s 271(1)(c) Requires Reevaluation as Per Section 275(1A) Provisions.

March 1, 2018

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - AO has levied the penalty without waiting for the outcome of the orders of the appellate authorities - the issue needs to be reexamined by the AO in the light of provisions of section 275(1A) - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) - assessee had failed to provide full submissions - penalty levied by the Assessing Officer u/s 271(1)(b) of the IT Act deserves to be...

  2. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - a case of furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income has not been made out against the assessee. - Though, similar disallowances were made by...

  3. Levy of penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - Addition of LTCG - Assessing Officer while recording satisfaction has invoked both the charges of section 271(1)(c) - ambiguity and...

  4. Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - recording of specific finding or not? - In para 7 of the penalty order u/s. 271(1)(c), the Assessing Officer held that it is found to be a fit...

  5. Penalty levied u/s 271 (1) (c) - As the appellants had disclosed the income, after detection by the department and as per the terms of settlement, the assessing officer...

  6. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - CIT(A) has given direction to the Assessing Officer to levy penalty equivalent to 100% tax under section 271(1)(c) of the Act. Mere estimate of...

  7. The case involved a dispute over penalty imposition u/ss 271(1)(c) versus 271(1B) for additions related to estimated income from share trading transactions. The...

  8. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was levied by the Assessing Officer solely based on the order of the Income Tax Settlement Commission withdrawing immunity from penalty and...

  9. Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for two types of additions: (1) the addition made u/s 50C on the difference between stamp duty value and sale...

  10. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that no penalty u/s 271(1)(c) can be imposed for an ad-hoc disallowance of 20% of expenses made by the Assessing Officer....

  11. The crux pertains to levying penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for alleged furnishing of inaccurate particulars or concealment of income regarding capital gains computation on sale...

  12. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - additional income in the return filed in response to notice u/s 153A/153C - The tribunal dismissed the appeal of the assessee, upholding the...

  13. Penalty levied u/s. 271(1)(c) - Suo-moto declaration of undisclosed assets located outside India under section 59 of the Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and...

  14. Levy of penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - The appellant contended that the addition made by the Assessing Officer was based solely on estimations, making it ineligible for...

  15. The assessee had conceded the compensation income to be included as income from other sources. However, upon judicial examination, the compensation was found to be...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates