Reopening of assessment - source of the cash deposits post ...

Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Due to Invalid Reasons for Cash Deposit Inquiry Post-Demonetization.

September 14, 2018

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Reopening of assessment - source of the cash deposits post demonetization - AO in the reasons recorded has simply kept aside the assessee's explanation for the availability of cash on hand for deposit post demonetization. The reasons thus clearly lacked validity and proceeded on erroneous premise. - Notice for initiation of reassessment proceedings quashed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Reopening of assessment - source of the cash deposits post ...

Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Due to Invalid Reasons for Cash Deposit Inquiry Post-Demonetization.

September 14, 2018

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

HC held that the AO's reassessment notice under Section 147 was invalid. The AO mechanically recorded reasons based on third-party information without providing...

The court held that the Joint Assessing Officer (JAO) lacked jurisdiction to issue notices u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act for reassessment, as per Section 151A read with...

Reopening of assessment under old regime - scope of new regime - scope of TOLA - In this detailed judgement, the Court found that the notice issued under Section 148 was...

Reassessment - Validity of notice u/s 148 of the Act – Reason to believe – The material found in post search enquiries could form a “reason to believe“ that income had...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 against non-existing entity - scheme of the amalgamation and arrangement approved - The High Court acknowledges the petitioner's argument...

ITAT invalidated reassessment proceedings due to jurisdictional defects in notice issuance under s.148. ITO Ward 3(2), Bulandsahar transferred assessee's records to ITO...

The High Court considered the validity of reassessment orders u/s 148A(d) where reasons differed from those in notices u/s 148A(b). The primary issue was the taxability...

Section 143(2) is a mandatory requirement, and failure to comply with it renders the reassessment proceedings invalid. The High Court has consistently held that Section...

Assessing Officer conducted due enquiries regarding cash deposits during demonetization period, called for details from assessee to substantiate source. AO applied mind,...

Reassessment action initiated based on Section 148 notice and subsequent Section 148A(b) notice violated the First Proviso to Section 149(1) and was barred by the...

Cash deposited post demonetization period - AO making the addition of 30% of the cash deposited in the bank during post demonetization period - addition made by the AO...

The High Court addressed the validity of a seizure order u/s 67(2) of the CGST Act, focusing on whether the term "things" includes cash/currency seized during search and...

Validity of reassessment order - Notice sent on wrong (old) E-mail ID - The petitioner company had two email addresses, one used until 2019 and another operational since...

The High Court held that the reassessment order dated 12.05.2023 and subsequent proceedings were invalid as they were beyond the statutory limitation period prescribed...

Notice issued against dissolved firm invalid; firm ceased to exist, rendering reassessment proceedings untenable. Apex Court's decision in Maruti Suzuki case mandates...

Quick Updates: