Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Disclosure of relevant facts - 1/5th ROC ...

Income Tax

March 15, 2019

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Disclosure of relevant facts - 1/5th ROC expenditure allowable u/s 35D - if all necessary details were made available by the assessee, the mere fact that the addition made in the course of assessment proceedings in the peculiar facts was not challenged in appeal by itself is neither here nor there is not sufficient to levy of penalty.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Disclosure of relevant facts - 1/5th ROC ...

Income Tax

March 15, 2019

You may also like:

Explanation versus bona finde explanation versus proper disclosure - Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - AT

Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - disallowance of capital expenditure of Research and Development - The facts material to the computation were not produced - levy of...

Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - disclosure of income during search operation - such undisclosed income would get immunised from the levy of penalty. - AT

Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – the penalty imposed for disallowing claim of expenditure on foreign education and foreign travelling cannot be upheld - AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Disallowance of interest expenditure under section 43B as well as disallowance export product development expenses - Just because the assessee...

Merely because assessee had claimed expenditure which was not accepted or not acceptable to Revenue that by itself would not attract a penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - AT

Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - AO has not unearthed any new fact from his independent sources which could lead to furnishing of inaccurate particulars by the assessee...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) on unrecorded receipts, expenditure and investments declared by the assessee pursuant to search confirmed - AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - the fact that assessee has furnished inaccurate particulars for the purpose of determining the tax u/s 115JB stands established - penalty confirmed - HC

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act - difference of opinion with regard to the nature of expenditure would not amount to furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income - AT

Quick Updates: