Profiteering - supply of “Matchless Plus TTWG Grinder” - Failure ...

Penalty Proceedings Initiated for Profiteering Due to Non-Compliance with Section 171 of CGST Act on Grinder Sales.

March 27, 2019

Case Laws GST NAPA

Profiteering - supply of “Matchless Plus TTWG Grinder” - Failure to pass the benefit of reduction in rate of tax - The Respondent has acted in contravention of the provisions of Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017 - penalty proceedings initiated.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Profiteering - supply of “Matchless Plus TTWG Grinder” - Failure ...

Penalty Proceedings Initiated for Profiteering Due to Non-Compliance with Section 171 of CGST Act on Grinder Sales.

March 27, 2019

Case Laws GST NAPA

You may also like:

Proceedings initiated u/s 144C - legality of the order by framing the so-called draft assessment order - while framing the said draft assessment order, the AO not only...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Validity of notice - It is a well settled proposition of law that penalty cannot be initiated for the limb, which is different from the limb for...

Initiation of penalty proceedings u/s 271C and the limitation period for levying such penalty. The key points are: The penalty proceedings were initiated on the date of...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - non-compliance of notice issues - if the quantum proceedings itself are declared to be bad in law and quashed , then any non compliance on the...

Penalty proceedings under CGST Act cannot be initiated after State GST Authorities have initiated proceedings on the same subject matter. Once proceedings are initiated...

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) for under reporting income - defective notice - The Tribunal agrees with the appellant's argument, emphasizing that the AO did not apply his mind...

The court held that Section 6(2)(b) of the Act treats the empowered officers under the SGST/UGST Act at the central level to be at par and does not prescribe for...

Revision u/s 263 - penalty proceedings u/s 271AAB(1A) - The mandate under section 263 of the Act do not give any power to CIT to impose his satisfaction over the...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was levied by the Assessing Officer solely based on the order of the Income Tax Settlement Commission withdrawing immunity from penalty and...

The key points are regarding the penalty imposed u/s 271D read with Section 269SS, and the issue of whether the penalty orders were time-barred. The Assessing Officer...

Levy of Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) in case of voluntary surrender of income - disallowance of claim of loss - Assessee offered the loss voluntarily to avoid litigation and...

Once a resolution plan is approved u/s 31(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC), only the debts specified in the resolution plan remain payable. This...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) allowed the assessee's appeal and directed the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act to be deleted. The Assessing Officer...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 v/s assessment u/s 153C - proceedings initiated u/s 132 - The correct course of reassessment is under section 153C not under section 147...

Proper officer - Jurisdiction of Initiate investigation proceedings by the Central GST and State GST authorities simultaneously - cross-empowerment - The Court found...

Quick Updates: