Profiteering - supply of “Matchless Plus TTWG Grinder” - Failure ...

GST

March 27, 2019

Profiteering - supply of “Matchless Plus TTWG Grinder” - Failure to pass the benefit of reduction in rate of tax - The Respondent has acted in contravention of the provisions of Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017 - penalty proceedings initiated.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Profiteering - supply of “Matchless Plus TTWG Grinder” - Failure ...

GST

March 27, 2019

You may also like:

Profiteering - restaurant service - benefit of reduction of tax from 18% to 5% not passed to customers - applicant could not establish profiteering for want of credible evidence

Profiteering - supply of ‘Sujata Mixer Grinder 900W’ - rate of GST was reduced from 28% to 18% - by increasing the base price of the product the benefit of reduction in...

Profiteering - supply of “Snacks” - benefit of reduction in the rate of tax not passed on - Profiteering proceedings are only concerned with ascertaining whether the...

Profiteering - Construction services - allegation is that the benefit of ITC not passed to customers/flat buyers/recipients, by way of commensurate reduction in the...

Profiteering - Failure to reduce Maximum Retail Prices (MRPs) - Petition against the decision of NATIONAL ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY - HUL directed to pre-deposit...

Works Contract for construction of Flats, Complex — Builders to pass on GST benefit to buyer otherwise anti-profiteering provisions of Section 171 of GST Act to apply - Circular

Profiteering - supply of Services by way of admission to exhibition of cinematography films - benefit of reduction in the GST rate not passed on - the Respondent is...

Profiteering - purchase of flat - The contention of the Respondent is dismissed that the excess (more than commensurate) benefit amounting to ₹ 3,91,714/- passed...

Profiteering - purchase of Flats - it is alleged that Respondent had not passed on the benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) availed by way of commensurate reduction in the...

Profiteering - purchased a flat in the Respondent's project - allegation is that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) to him by way of...

Quick Updates: