Applicability of Rule 8(3A) of the CER, 2002 - prospective or ...

Central Excise

July 17, 2019

Applicability of Rule 8(3A) of the CER, 2002 - prospective or retrospective - the rule is substantive in character since it relates to payment terms regarding duty and the effects of default in payment thereof and it is not at all procedural - only prospective operation - nothing in the said Rule suggest that it would have retrospective effect

View Source

← Previous Next →

Applicability of Rule 8(3A) of the CER, 2002 - prospective or ...

Central Excise

July 17, 2019

You may also like:

CENVAT Credit - restrictions in using the cenvat credit for payment of duty for the clearances - Pursuant to quashing of Rule 8(3A) by the Hon’ble Gujarat High Court,...

Penalty under rule 26 of the CER, 2002 can be imposed on a person only when it is proved beyond doubt that the person dealing with excisable goods knew or had reason to...

Penalty u/r 27 of CER 2002 - Delay in submitting ARE-1 Applications against export of goods - contravention of Rule 19 of CER 2002 - The delay caused is nothing but...

Vires of Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - At least four different High Courts have struck down the constitutional validity of Rule 8(3A) of Central Excise...

Constitutional validity of Rule 8(3A) of the 2002 Rules - the unamended Rule 8(3A) of 2002 Rules whereby the benefit of CENVAT Credit for all the period till the actual...

Rule 18 of CER 2002 – Rebate of duty – CBEC has relaxed the condition of export of tea direct from factory – Rebate claims under Rule 18 should be sanctioned - CGOVT

Penalty under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - Contravention of Rule 8(3A) - penalty under Rule 25 is not permissible, but penalty under Rule 27 is to be imposed - AT

Imposition of penalty u/r 26(2) of CER, 2002 - CENVAT Credit - Wrong availment of credit and reversal thereof on being pointed out before the issue of SCN - maximum...

Levy of penalty under Rule 25 of CER, 2002 – issuing invoices without accompanying the goods - appellant not dealt with the excisable goods at all. The penalties on the...

Since Appellant were paying the duty utilizing the CENVAT Credit they cannot be charged for contravention of the provisions of Rule 4, 8(1), 8(3) & 8(3A) of the Central...

Constitutional validity of Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules 2002 - Condition contained in sub-rule (3A) of rule 8 for payment of duty without utilizing the cenvat...

Imposition of Penalty - violation of Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 are clearly proved. Provisions Rule 8(3A) are self-contained requiring penal actions....

Amendment in notification - retrospective effect or prospective? - A benefit available on a plain reading of the notification cannot be denied retrospectively by issuing...

Reversal of Cenvat credit on input services - Rule 6 (3A) of CER - merely because appellant has failed to exercise option and follow procedural prescribed under Rule...

Challange to the bail granted by the HC - Money Laundering - scheduled offence - The High Court has neither considered the rigour of Section 45 of the PML Act, 2002 nor...

Quick Updates: