Clandestine removal - The cross examination of tempo driver was ...

Cross-examination of tempo driver in clandestine removal case not repeated, aligns with natural justice principles.

July 18, 2019

Case Laws Central Excise AT

Clandestine removal - The cross examination of tempo driver was already allowed earlier and therefore there was no reason for the adjudicating authority to grant cross examination again and again and cannot be considered to be violative of principles of natural justice.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Clandestine removal - The cross examination of tempo driver was ...

Cross-examination of tempo driver in clandestine removal case not repeated, aligns with natural justice principles.

July 18, 2019

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

The AT rejected appellant's contention that denial of cross-examination of departmental officers violated natural justice principles. The tribunal distinguished between...

Clandestine Removal - As per the provisions of section 9D it is clear that during adjudication, the adjudicating authority is required to first examine the witness in...

Clandestine removal - consumption of electricity - the charge of clandestine removal is to be established on examination of facts of each case and not merely on the...

Clandestine removal demand based on electrical consumption was challenged. Average electricity consumption for certain periods was calculated. Cross-examination of...

The case pertains to the allegation of clandestine manufacture and clearance of structural items/rolled products by the appellant. The revenue's case rested solely on...

Clandestine removal - The denial of cross-examination tantamount to violation of natural justice. The demand has wholly been raised, on the basis of the statements...

Clandestine removal of excisable goods alleged based on statements recorded from partners, employees, and buyers. Section 9D of Central Excise Act mandates...

Violation of principles of natural justice - denial of cross-examination - revocation of customs broker license, forfeiture of security deposit, and penalty imposed by...

Principles of natural justice - rejection of cross-examination - The petitioner has approached this Court prematurely as the respondents have only rejected the request...

Clandestine removal of goods - the cross-examination of person from whose premises these documents had been recovered was necessary, more so when the same had been...

The summary focuses on the rejection of cross-examination of DRI officers and a co-noticee by the competent authority. The main objective of cross-examination is to...

Validity of reassessment order u/s 147 - Denial of Cross-Examination Opportunity - Reliance of statement of third party - The High Court noted that the petitioner did...

Allegations of clandestine removal of polished vitrified tiles and evasion of duty were primarily based on private documents/records recovered from premises of M/s K.N....

Violation of principles of natural justice - From the statutory provision of section 138 B, it is not the option for the Adjudicating Authority to allow or not to allow...

The CESTAT set aside the demand and penalties imposed on the grounds of alleged clandestine removal, holding that the charge was not substantiated by sufficient evidence....

Quick Updates: