Penalty - mere a technical omission or violation of law would ...

No Penalty for Form Omission if Transactions Documented; No Intent to Evade Tax, Authority Lacks Power to Penalize.

July 24, 2019

Case Laws VAT and Sales Tax HC

Penalty - mere a technical omission or violation of law would not empower the authority to impose penalty - since there is only a technical defect of non-submission of form, while the entire transactions are reflected in the book of accounts submitted voluntarily to the dept. - there was no intention to evade tax hence no penalty

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty - mere a technical omission or violation of law would ...

No Penalty for Form Omission if Transactions Documented; No Intent to Evade Tax, Authority Lacks Power to Penalize.

July 24, 2019

Case Laws VAT and Sales Tax HC

You may also like:

Levy of penalty - at the time of detention was that one of the E-Way Bills had expired - The High court held that mens rea to evade tax is essential for imposing...

The case involved a challenge to a penalty imposed u/s 129 of the Goods and Service Tax Acts. The court held that without proof of intent to evade tax, such penalties...

Levy of penalty for violation of section 129 and Rule 138 - Failure to update the E-way bill on change of vehicle after breakdown - The imposition of penalties for mere...

The HC held that the detention of petitioner's goods was unjustified as authorities failed to prove intent to evade tax payment, a mandatory requirement u/s 129(3) of...

Penalty order - Part-B of the e-way bill was not filled up - intent to evade tax - The High court, referencing a previous judgment, ruled that such technical errors, in...

Imposition of tax and penalty u/s 129(3) - e-way bill had expired nine hours and thirty minutes prior to interception - The High court referred to previous cases where...

Levy of penalty - Detention of goods alongwith vehicle - wrong E-way bill - in penal provision such as Section 129 of the GST Act, the element of intention to evade tax...

Levy of penalties u/ss 122 and 129 of CGST/SGST Acts - expiry of e-way bill - mens rea in penalty imposition. Technically, violation of law by petitioner in transporting...

Levy of penalty - non filling up of Part 'B' of the e-Way Bill - existence of mens rea or not The High Court referenced a specific case and highlighted that the issue of...

Levy of penalty - goods were unloaded at a place that was not registered in the registration certificate - unloading goods at a location not specified in the e-way bill...

The High Court quashed penalty u/s E-Way Bill violation, classifying goods as ODC due to speed without intent to evade tax. Relying on precedent, mens rea is essential...

Penalty order - wrongful mention of place of supply in E-Way bills - intent to evade tax or not - The High Court noted that the incorrect address mentioned in the E-Way...

Levy of penalty u/s 54(1)(14) - no papers were produced despite the fact that goods were being imported from outside the State - There is always apprehension that in...

Penalty u/s 129(3) of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 - goods detained on the ground that the goods were being transported on a vehicle different from...

Penalty imposed on trader for importing goods with invalid import declaration form (Form XVI) instead of prescribed Form XVI u/s 48A of Uttarakhand VAT Act. Tribunal...

Quick Updates: