Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights July 2019 Year 2019 This

TP adjustment - exclusion and inclusion of comparables - since ...


ITAT Rules on Transfer Pricing Adjustments; Rejects Comparables Due to Filters and Dissimilarity; No Law Question Arises.

July 24, 2019

Case Laws     Income Tax     HC

TP adjustment - exclusion and inclusion of comparables - since in respect of each of the comparables, the ITAT has given detailed reasons why the comparables should be rejected either because of failing the filter or because of functional dissimilarity and also followed earlier decisions concerning assessee - no substantial question of law arises

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. ITAT excluded four entities (Eclerx Services Ltd., TCS E-serve Ltd., Infosys BPO Ltd., and Tech. Mahindra Ltd.) from the comparable array in transfer pricing adjustment....

  2. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that in determining the arm's length price for transfer pricing adjustments, three companies (MOIAPL, LCAPL, and MOEPAPL)...

  3. Transfer pricing adjustment concerning comparability selection and attribution of profits between the respondent assessee and foreign Associated Enterprise. TPO rejected...

  4. ITAT adjudicated transfer pricing dispute regarding comparable company selection. The tribunal determined the Arm's Length Price (ALP) computation by the Transfer...

  5. Transfer pricing adjustment on equity broking services (non-DVP segment/CH settlement) rejected due to negligible difference of 0.01% after considering cost adjustment...

  6. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) adjudicated on various transfer pricing issues concerning an assessee. Regarding segmentation of business activities, the ITAT...

  7. ITAT adjudicated transfer pricing dispute, directing significant procedural adjustments. The tribunal found computational discrepancies in Arm's Length Price (ALP),...

  8. ITAT ruled that the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) improperly determined Arm's Length Price (ALP) without following prescribed methods under Rule 10B. The TPO merely...

  9. This case pertains to a transfer pricing (TP) adjustment dispute involving the selection of the most appropriate method - Resale Price Method (RPM) or Transactional Net...

  10. Transfer pricing adjustment - Purchase of goods from Associated Enterprises (AE) - Most Appropriate Method (MAM) - Resale Price Method (RPM) considered as MAM for...

  11. Transfer pricing adjustment rejected assessee's comparable companies in TP study analysis. Directed TPO to examine if companies are functionally comparable, apply...

  12. Transfer pricing officer (TPO) erred by considering non-associated enterprise (non-AE) revenue and costs while computing transfer pricing (TP) adjustment, contrary to...

  13. ITAT adjudicated transfer pricing dispute regarding software development services benchmarking. The Tribunal comprehensively examined functional comparability, rejecting...

  14. TP Adjustment - comparable selection - The ITAT that the turnover filter cannot be applied as a tool for cherry picking the comparables at the later stage after...

  15. TP Adjustment - selection of most appropriate method (MAM) - Resale Price Method or Transactional Net Margin Method - Introduction of Fresh Comparables - Removal of 3%...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates