Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - suo moto disclosure of income ...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Not Imposed Due to Inability to Revise Late Return u/s 139(5.

February 18, 2020

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - suo moto disclosure of income before detection by the AO - It is the settled law that the belated return cannot be revised under the provisions of section 139(5) of the Act. In view of the above we hold that there was no possibility for the assessee to revise the return of income - No penalty - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - suo moto disclosure of income ...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Not Imposed Due to Inability to Revise Late Return u/s 139(5.

February 18, 2020

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee company failed to provide bonafide explanation for inflated expenses claimed in revised return, contrary to audited...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - income voluntarily offered before commencement of assessment proceedings - the time limit for furnishing the revised return of income u/s 139(5)...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - proof of contravention of provisions provided under explanation 5A to section 271(1)(c) - On reference to the provisions of explanation 5A to...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - revised returns were not valid returns u/s 139(5) and that, such returns were not voluntarily filed rather the same were filed only after...

Validity of revised return filed vis-a-vis claims made thereunder - revised return treated as non-est - the appellant filed his original return otherwise than u/s 139(1)...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) levied on income declared in the revised return of income filed u/s. 139(5) - Admittedly, there is no allegation that the revised return of income...

Penalty being 300% by invoking Section 271(1)(c) - return was revised before completion of assessment - Revenue is not justified in imposing penalty under Section 271(1)(c) - HC

Non-filer assessee had taxable income but failed to file return u/s 139(1), later filed return in response to notice u/s 148 without considering section 50C provisions,...

Section 80P deduction claim filed in a return submitted in response to notice u/s 142(1) is valid. The Income Tax Act does not mandate that the return must be filed u/ss...

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) r.w.s. 274 - additional income declared in the return filed in response to notice u/s 153A as compared to original returned filed u/s...

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - If AO accepted the revised return, there was no question of making inadmissible claim of deduction u/s 10B in such revised return. In fact,...

Penalty levied u/s.271(1)(c) - revised return filed - assessee has adopted the recourse of avoiding litigation, therefore, revised the return to buy peace of mind - no...

Validity of revised return u/s 139(5) - return was revised after issuance of intimation u/s 143(1) - claim of benefit of excess set off of losses and carry forward of...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - survey u/s 133A was carried out much prior of date of filing of return u/s 139(1) - amount admitted in survey has offered in return - When the...

Levy of Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - The ITAT ruled that since there was no variation between the returned and assessed income, there was no concealment of income by the...

Quick Updates: