Since misdeclaration of the value of the imported goods has been ...

Goods Misdeclared, Liable for Confiscation; Fine u/s 125 Unjustified Due to Unavailability of Goods.

September 26, 2012

Case Laws Customs AT

Since misdeclaration of the value of the imported goods has been upheld, the goods are held liable for confiscation. - However, since the said goods are not available for confiscation, imposition of fine under Section 125 is not justified. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Since misdeclaration of the value of the imported goods has been ...

Goods Misdeclared, Liable for Confiscation; Fine u/s 125 Unjustified Due to Unavailability of Goods.

September 26, 2012

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

Levy of Redemption Fine and penalty - Confiscation of imported goods - The goods imported were restricted goods and could have been imported on the basis of the Licence...

Confiscation - Redemption fine - Since in the instant case, the appellant/ revenue has accepted the setting aside order of confiscation of goods, question of applying...

Absolute Confiscation of imported goods - Arecanut - prohibited goods or not - The Original Authority is directed to give an option to appellant to redeem the goods on...

Since misdeclaration of the value of the imported goods has been upheld, the goods are held liable for confiscation. - However, since the said goods are not available...

The CESTAT allowed the appeal against the imposition of redemption fine u/s 125 of the Customs Act, 1962. The Tribunal held that when the exported goods are unavailable,...

The case pertains to the imposition of a fine and penalty for the rejection of the declared value and redetermination of the value u/r 12 of the Customs Valuation...

Appellant not the importer of motorbike, hence not liable to pay Customs Duty u/s 28 of Customs Act, 1962. Confiscation of motorbike set aside due to lack of finding on...

Imported goods did not correspond to the description in the Bill of Entry, with a discrepancy in thickness. The transaction value was correctly rejected u/r 12 due to...

Confiscation of Goods and vehicle - Sections 129 and 130 of GST - Even in the absence of the physical availability of the goods or the conveyance, the authority can...

CESTAT upheld reclassification of imported high conductivity copper bus bars from CTI 7407 21 20 to CTI 7407 10 30, resulting in denial of FTA benefits under N/N....

Confiscation of goods already exported - redemption fine in lieu of confiscation imposed - export of iron ore fines - Fe content of the iron ore fines - In a case where...

Liability of redemption fine when goods are confiscated - redemption fine, is an option in lieu of confiscation and hence, both cannot run simultaneously, which means...

Confiscation of goods - redemption fine and penalty - mens rea - import of prohibited items - It cannot be accepted that on the mere score of re-export of the prohibited...

The case involved confiscation of imported goods u/s 111(d) of CA 1962, re-exportation, redemption fine, and penalty u/s 112(a). Goods were imported in contravention of...

Confiscation - redemption fine - penalty - Misdeclaration of quantity and value of imported goods - the goods were found to be in excess of the entry made i.e. the bill...

Quick Updates: