Maintainability of writ petition - It is worthwhile to point out ...

Writ Petition Maintainability Challenged: Procedural Lapses in 2008-09 Penalty Order; Dealer Denied Personal Hearing Under Article 226.

March 3, 2021

Case Laws VAT and Sales Tax HC

Maintainability of writ petition - It is worthwhile to point out that the order levying penalty for the assessment year 2008-09 is dated 30.1.2014. Though the dealer's objections were received on 16.10.2012, the Assessing Officer did not afford any opportunity of personal hearing to the appellant though more than one year had lapsed. This, in our considered view, is a serious issue because the dealer has taken a specific stand that the software is being used in the manufacture. - the exceptional circumstances as mentioned above warranting exercise of jurisdiction under Article 226 - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Maintainability of writ petition - It is worthwhile to point out ...

Writ Petition Maintainability Challenged: Procedural Lapses in 2008-09 Penalty Order; Dealer Denied Personal Hearing Under Article 226.

March 3, 2021

Case Laws VAT and Sales Tax HC

You may also like:

Benefit u/s 11(1A) - Once the AO has accepted the plea that transfer took place in AY 2008-09 and assessed income under long term capital gains in the hands of Assessee,...

Addition made towards receipt Assignment of Fee - Assessee has withdrawn amount from Escrow account and utilized for its business purpose - Although, there is a timing...

The amount sought to be disallowed was debited in the financial year 2006-07 which is not at all relevant for the assessment year 2008-09 in which assessment is sought...

Inclusion of AY in which search was conducted into the period of 6 assessment years - recording of satisfaction during the next year - assessment for assessment year...

The ITAT ruled that the transfer of booking rights in a capital asset was completed in AY 2009-10, not AY 2008-09. The agreement to sell was contingent on builder's...

Denying of CENVAT Credit - Availment of credit on the basis of Advice of Transfer Debit - procedural lapse cannot be considered as a reason to deny Cenvat credit involved - AT

NCLAT dismissed the appeal challenging a procedural order related to a company petition. The tribunal held that the impugned order did not dilute any party's rights and...

CENVAT credit - procedural lapses - whether credit of Cenvat taken on the basis of ISD Invoices issued by the Head Office of the appellant units is deniable for curable...

NCLAT dismissed the appeal challenging the auction notice and denied stay of the impugned order. The Tribunal found no procedural flaws in the liquidation process,...

The High Court held that the Revenue's decision to adjust the refund due to the petitioner for the assessment years 2008-09 and 2017-18 against the stayed demand for the...

Import of servcies - there is no evidence as to why the payment was made in 2008-09 in respect of the service received in 2004-05 - demand of service tax confirmed - AT

Net profit @ 6% on bank deposits made - authorities below shall apply profit rate of 5% for the purpose of computing part addition as was directed in assessment year 2008-09 - AT

Applicability of section 292BB – The new provision is applicable for the assessment year 2008-09 and certainly not applicable for the assessment year under consideration...

Confiscation - imported four Mercedes Benz cars - restricted goods or not - While recognizing the mandatory nature of the type approval certificate under Rule 126 CMVR,...

Penalty - The plea that substantial benefit should not be denied for procedural lapse is clearly not tenable as there is fraudulent availment of Cenvat credit without...

Quick Updates: