Extended period of limitation - It is pertinent to note that the ...

Importer Transparency Prevents Five-Year Reopening u/s 28(4) Due to No Intentional Misstatement of Facts.

March 10, 2021

Case Laws Customs SC

Extended period of limitation - It is pertinent to note that the importer had asked for a first check and had shown the cameras and the cameras were offered on 20.3.2012 along with Bill of Entry and literature detailing specifications of models. - It is difficult in such circumstances to infer that there was any wilful misstatement of facts. In these circumstances, it must, therefore, follow that the extended period of limitation of five years was not available to any authority to re-open under Section 28(4). - SC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Extended period of limitation - It is pertinent to note that the ...

Importer Transparency Prevents Five-Year Reopening u/s 28(4) Due to No Intentional Misstatement of Facts.

March 10, 2021

Case Laws Customs SC

You may also like:

The High Court examined the validity of a show cause notice issued u/s 28 of the Customs Act, invoking the extended period of limitation. The court held that the proper...

Duty demand u/s 28(1) of Customs Act, 1962, upon importer and transferee of license issued by DGFT - Liability of transferee for fraudulently obtained license - Levy of...

Section 28A of the Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1973 dispenses with the requirement of a second notice and opportunity of personal hearing before proceeding with best...

Invocation of larger (extended) period of limitation under Section 28(4) of the Customs Act, 1962 - The tribunal found sufficient evidence to support the allegation of...

Levy of penalty u/s 112(a) - There is admitted case of collusion and forgery plus concoction of documents, including presenting and filing of false and incorrect...

Validity of SCN - Levy of Penalty u/s 112(a) of Customs Act on CHA - abetment of offence committed by the importer as against which the petitioner - scope of Sections...

Rates of Tax on Goods - Schedule 4 - IGST @ 28% - CGST @ 14% - SGST / UTGST @ 14% - GST

The writ petition challenging notices u/ss 13(2) and 13(4) of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, including alleged arbitrary action for non-compliance with a letter of arrangement...

Petition challenging seizure memorandum, show cause notice (SCN), and lookout notice issued regarding mis-declaration of imported goods dismissed. SCN issued u/s 28(4)...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Reopning after 4 years - As per the mandate of law, even where a concluded assessment is sought to be reopened by the A.O within a...

Misdeclaration of imported polished marble slabs as unpolished slabs. Excess quantity found during physical verification. Customs duty demanded along with interest and...

The HC determined that issuing two show cause notices (SCNs) under different subsections of Section 28 for identical factual matrices is impermissible. The impugned SCN...

Amendment of section 44AD. - computing profits and gains of business on presumptive basis - where an assessee declares profit for any previous year in accordance with...

GST slab of 28% may become virtual "hollow shell" in year or so, says CEA

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - while reopening no allegation was made by the learned AO of failure on the part of the assessee to disclose fully and truly all...

Quick Updates: